AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

JOHN DEASON, Plaintiffs, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Defendants.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed and considered the petitions of Amanda M. Morris and Mark E. Toth of the law firm of Hall, Bloch, Garland & Meyer LLP, 577 Mulberry Street, Suite 1500, Macon, Georgia 31201, for permission to appear pro hac vice on behalf of defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al., in the above-captioned case,

Said request is hereby GRANTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter Amanda M. Morris and Mark E. Toth as counsel of record for defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al., in this case.

SO ORDERED this 1st day of September, 2015.

/s/_________


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Deason v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.
(Sep 1, 2015)