AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LJUBICA RAJKOVIC, Plaintiff, v. FOREIGN & COMMONWEALTH OFFICE, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on "Plaintiff's Motion for Relief From a Proceeding Rule 69(b) F.R.C.P." [ECF No. 5]. Pursuant to Rule 60(b), the Court may relieve a party from a final judgment for one of five specific grounds, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(5), none of which apply in this case, or for "any other reason that justifies relief," Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Relief under Rule 60(b)(6) should be granted only if the moving party demonstrates "'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the reopening of a final judgment." Salazar ex rel. Salazar v. District of Columbia, 633 F.3d 1110, 1116 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 534 (2005)); see Good Luck Nursing Home, Inc. v. Harris, 636 F.2d 572, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (noting that "this form of relief should only be sparingly used"). On review of the motion, the Court concludes that plaintiff is not entitled to the relief she seeks. The complaint reasonably is construed as one brought under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), see 5 U.S.C. § 552, and there is no cause of action under the FOIA against a foreign government entity.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Relief From a Proceeding Rule 69(b) F.R.C.P. [5] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED. DATE: October 2, 2015

/s/_________


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Rajkovic v. Foreign & Commonwealth Office
(Oct 2, 2015)