United States v. John Doe

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 13–4274.

Attorney(S)

William C. Kaczynski, Esquire, (Argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellant. David J. Hickton, United States Attorney, Laura S. Irwin, (Argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Rebecca R. Haywood, Esquire, Margaret E. Picking, Esquire, Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellee.

Judges

Thomas L. Ambro

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 13–4274.

Attorney(S)

William C. Kaczynski, Esquire, (Argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellant. David J. Hickton, United States Attorney, Laura S. Irwin, (Argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Rebecca R. Haywood, Esquire, Margaret E. Picking, Esquire, Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellee.

Judges

Thomas L. Ambro

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

UNITED STATES of America v. John DOE, Appellant.

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

William C. Kaczynski, Esquire, (Argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellant.

David J. Hickton, United States Attorney, Laura S. Irwin, (Argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Rebecca R. Haywood, Esquire, Margaret E. Picking, Esquire, Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellee.

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

UNITED STATES of America v. John DOE, Appellant.

Comments