Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

MICHEAL A. BRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON HEALTH CORPORATION, et al. Defendants.

ORDER

Inmate Micheal (not Michael) A. Bright, proceeding pro se, brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit over the medical care he received inside the Chatham County, Georgia jail. Doc. 1 at 5. While there, he says, he "was given medication by a nurse employee of Corizon Health, Inc. (nurse Simmons) that was the direct cause of my heart flatlining 3 (three) times and having me hospitalized for 17 (seventeen) day[s]. . . ." Id. Bright "hold[s] the employer . . . responsible for nearly taking my life away from me!" Id. He seeks $3 million. Id. at 6.

There are Michael (not Micheal) A. Bright lawsuits on this Court's docket. Attached are pre-digital-docket sheets for Bright v. Chatham Cnty Jail, MC497-045, doc. 6 (S.D. Ga. June 9, 1997) (case dismissed); Bright v. Savannah Police Dept., CV495-080, doc. 7 (S.D. Ga. May 17, 1995) (dismissing civil rights case as "legally frivolous"); and Bright v. Chatham County Sheriff, CV495-074, doc. 35 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 1996) (summary judgment to defendant, plaintiff's case dismissed).

In 1998 the Court digitized its filings (years later, this enabled E-filing). Prior year filings thus cannot be accessed without expensively retrieving them from the Federal Records Center. Short of that, one can gather what occurred in non-digitized cases by reading only the docket entries within them. Those entries summarize rulings made within court decisions. That is the case for the pre-1998 cases noted here.

In this lawsuit Micheal A. Bright used a standard § 1983 form complaint. Question 1(B) asked him, "[w]hile incarcerated in any facility, have you brought any lawsuits in federal court which deal with facts other than those involved in this action?" Doc. 1 at 2. Bright checked "no." Id. Question 1(C) asked whether he suffered any dismissals in IFP actions "on the ground that [such were] frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim?" He checked "no" again. Id. at 3.

The veracity of these answers are especially significant because serial filers who seek IFP status face the three-strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as illuminated in Owens v. Morales, 2015 WL 5040245 at * 1 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 25, 2015) and Williams v. Freesemann, 2015 WL 6798946 at * 1 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 15, 2015). That provision states:

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (emphasis added).

Bright's incentive to omit his prior case information is strong because of the § 1915(g) three-strike bar. If he is the same Michael A. Bright as the litigant who brought those cases, then it would also support the reasonable inference that he changed the spelling of his first name to thwart the Court's § 1915(g) detection efforts (binary computer systems can omit prior cases if a name is off by just one letter).

A warning to Bright: Lying manipulation is not tolerated here. Willis v. Brown, CV412-209, 2012 WL 6016834 at * 1 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 23, 2012) ("Charles Anthony Willis, a 1915(g) three-striker, has once again lied to a judicial tribunal. Accordingly, his case should be dismissed for abusing the judicial process."), adopted, 2012 WL 6553919 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 12, 2012), aff'd, CV412-209, doc. 39 at 6 (11th Cir. July 30, 2013) ("[T]he District Court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed Mr. Willis's complaint as a sanction for violating Rule 11 's prohibition against filing false pleadings.").

Furthermore, liars may be prosecuted. See United States v. Dickerson, CR608-36, doc. 1 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 11, 2008) (§ 2255 movant indicted for perjury for knowingly lying in his motion seeking collateral relief from his conviction); id., doc. 47 (guilty verdict), cited in Colony Ins. Co. v. 9400 Abercorn, LLC, 866 F. Supp. 2d 1376, 1378 n. 2 (S.D. Ga. 2012) (collecting sanction cases).

The Court therefore ORDERS Bright to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lying to this Court. See Shelton v. Rohrs, 2010 WL 5122580 at * 1 (11th Cir. Dec. 15, 2010) (upholding dismissal for misleading the court and noting that "[e]ven if Shelton did not have access to his materials, he would have known that he filed multiple previous lawsuits"); McClain v. Nelson, 2011 WL 675030 at * 2 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 3, 2011), adopted, 2011 WL 674894 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 17, 2011).

This is a well-traveled road:

The district court in Hines v. Thomas also uncovered, inter alia, prior case concealment, and that figured into that court's ruling that the plaintiff had engaged in "conduct that courts have deemed abusive, and for which, courts have imposed the double sanction dismissing the action without prejudice and counting the dismissal as a strike on the ground of being malicious." 604 Fed.Appx. 796, 798 (11th Cir. 2015). The Hines appellate panel did not disagree with that misconduct assessment but ruled that the district court went too far. Id. at 800 (with prejudice dismissal of prisoner's case was an abuse of discretion, lesser sanction to be considered on remand, where inmate was "certainly negligent in failing to inform the court of his litigation history, [but] his actions as a whole d[id] not present a clear record of willful misconduct."). Even at that, a "without prejudice" dismissal likely would not have been reversed. Id. ("Had the dismissal truly been without prejudice to re-filing, the district court likely would not have abused its discretion in dismissing the action.").

Owens v
. Morales, 2015 WL 5040245 at * 2 (S.D, Ga. Aug. 25, 2015); see also id. at * 3 (the Court "gave Owens 21 days to complete a 'Show Cause Statement,' under penalty of perjury, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice (and fetch a § 1915(g) strike) for misleading, if not deliberately lying to, this Court."); id. (in response, he moved to voluntarily dismiss his case, and this Court granted it). --------

If Bright insists that another Michael A. Bright filed those prior cases, then he must declare that under penalty of perjury. Hence, he must return, within 21 days of the date this Order is served, his Show Cause Declaration (using the attached Statement form). On it he must clearly print his full name, especially his first name, and confirm whether he has used different forms of it (and if so, what they were) in the past. Finally, he must (as he has usefully done with his latest Complaint, doc. 1 at 1 & 7) furnish his inmate number next to his signature, and do so in any future cases or appeals that he may file.

SO ORDERED, this 18th day of December, 2015.

/s/ _________


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MICHEAL A. BRIGHT'S SHOW CAUSE DECLARATION

MY COMPLETE LEGAL NAME IS (PRINT CLEARLY):

__________ OTHER NAMES I HAVE USED IN THE PAST, INCLUDING ANY ALIASES (PRINT CLEARLY): __________ MY PREVIOUS LAWSUITS (CAPTION OF CASE, INCLUDING CASE NUMBER AND COURT(S) IN WHICH EACH CASE WAS FILED) (PRINT CLEARLY): __________ __________

I AM SHOWING CAUSE WHY THIS LAWSUIT SHOULDNOT BE DISMISSED (PRINT CLEARLY):

__________ Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 , I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct and that this was placed in my prison's mailing system on __________, 201___. Cross out the wrong spelling:
Cross out the wrong spelling:

/s/_________


Micheal A. Bright


Michael A. Bright Bright v. Chatham County Jail, et al
Assigned to: Judge B. Avant Edenfield
Demand: $0 Date Filed: 04/15/1997
Date Terminated: 06/09/1997
Nature of Suit: 0 zero
Jurisdiction: 0 Plaintiff
Michael A. Bright
represented by Michael A. Bright






9401 Dunwoody Drive


Savannah, GA 31406


PRO SE V. Defendant
Chatham County Jail
Defendant
Gary R. Blake
Defendant
Officer Martha Lucas

Date Filed

#

Docket Text

04/15/1997

CASE assigned to Judge B. Avant Edenfield (nmt) (Entered: 04/17/1997)

04/15/1997

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith (nmt) (Entered: 04/17/1997)

04/15/1997

1

AFFIDAVIT by Michael A. Bright Re: IFP (nmt) (Entered: 04/17/1997)

04/21/1997

2

ORDER directing Plaintiff to advise the Court as to whether or not he wishes toproceed pursuant to PRLA ( signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith ); copiesserved. (lsg) (Entered: 04/21/1997)

05/07/1997

3

MOTION by Michael A. Bright for dismissal (nmt) (Entered: 05/07/1997)

05/15/1997

4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge G. R. Smithrecommending that plaintiff's case be dismissed. Case no longer referred toMagistrate Judge G. R. Smith Objections to R and R due by 6/2/97 (dks)(Entered: 05/16/1997)

05/15/1997

5

ORDER directing Clerk to serve copies of R/R upon plaintiff and counsel for thedefendant ( signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith ); copies served. (dks)(Entered: 05/16/1997)

06/09/1997

6

ORDER adopting Magistrate's R & R as the opinion of this Court; case isDISMISSED. ( signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield ); copies served. (lsc)(Entered: 06/09/1997)

06/09/1997

Case closed (lsc) (Entered: 06/09/1997)

07/31/2000

Record transferred to the FRC. Group #021, Accession # 00 0542, Box # 3 of 5,Location # 4-010-85-4-9 (bcw) Modified on 6/27/2007 (Hill, Mary Anne).(Entered: 07/31/2000)

Bright v. Savannah Police Dept, et al
Assigned to; Judge B. Avant Edenfield
Demand: $0
Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Date Filed: 04/11/1995
Date Terminated: 05/17/1995
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil
Rights
Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff
Michael Anthony Bright
represented by Michael Anthony Bright








EF-344352


Post Office Box 7150


Garden City, Ga 31418


PRO SE V. Defendant
Savannah Police Department
Defendant
David Gellatly

Chief of Police
Defendant
Officer Kendricks

Date Filed

#

Docket Text

04/10/1995

1

AFFIDAVIT by Michael Anthony Bright Re: In Forma Pauperis (lsc) (Entered:04/11/1995)

04/11/1995

2

ORDER granting [1-1] affidavit for in forma pauperis ( signed by MagistrateJudge G. R, Smith ); copies served. (lsc) (Entered: 04/11/1995)

04/11/1995

3

COMPLAINT filed nunc pro tunc 04/10/95 (lsc) (Entered: 04/11/1995)

04/11/1995

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith (lsc) (Entered: 04/11/1995)

04/21/1995

4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge G. R. Smithrecommends action be dismissed as legally frivolous. Case no longer referred to

Magistrate G.R. Smith. Objections to R and R due by 5/1/95 (dks) (Entered:04/24/1995)

04/21/1995

5

ORDER serving copy of R/R on plaintiff by Clerk of Court with objections filedwith Clerk not later than May 8, 1995. ( signed by Magistrate Judge G. R.Smith ); copies served. (dks) (Entered: 04/24/1995)

05/17/1995

6

ORDER adopting Magistrate's R&R as opinion of the Court; case is dismissed.( signed by Chief Judge B, Avant Edenfield ); copies served. (lsc) (Entered:05/17/1995)

05/17/1995

7

JUDGMENT adopting Magistrate's R & R as opinion of the court for SavannahPolice Dept, David Gellatly, Kendricks against Michael Anthony Bright (); copiesserved. (lsc) (Entered: 05/17/1995)

05/17/1995

Case closed (lsc) (Entered: 05/17/1995)

05/22/1995

8

OBJECTION by plaintiff Michael Anthony Bright to [7-1] judgment order, [6-1]order (nmt) (Entered: 05/24/1995)

09/17/1996

Record transfered to the FRC. Group #021, Accession # 96-0593, Box # 69 of 70,Location # 5-001-00-3-9 (slt) Modified on 4/3/2009 (mah). (Entered: 09/17/1996)

Bright v. Chatham County Sheri, et al
Assigned to: Judge B. Avant Edenfield
Referred to: Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith
Demand: $0
Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Date Filed: 04/03/1995
Date Terminated: 03/25/1996
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil
Rights
Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff
Michael Anthony Bright
represented by Michael Anthony Bright









EF344352


Valdosta Correctional Institution


P.O. Box 310


Valdosta, GA 31603-0310


PRO SE V. Defendant
Ricky Mikells
represented by Emily E. Garrard


Chatham County Attorney's Office


P.O. Box 8161


Savannah, GA 31412-8161


912-652-7881


Fax: 912-652-7887


LEAD ATTORNEY


ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Thomas J. Mahoney, Jr.


Ranitz, Mahoney & Mahoney, PC


P.O. Box 786


Savannah, GA 31402


912-233-7961


Fax: 912-236-0288


Email: tmahoneyjr@ranitzlaw.com


LEAD ATTORNEY


ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed

#

Docket Text

04/03/1995

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith (nmt) (Entered:04/04/1995)

04/03/1995

1

MOTION by Michael Anthony Bright to Proceed in Forma Pauperis nunc protunc 3-23-95 (nmt) (Entered: 04/04/1995)

04/03/1995

2

ORDER granting [1-1] motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Directing Clerk toserve deft Ricky Mikells only. ( signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith );copies served. (nmt) Modified on 04/04/1995 (Entered: 04/04/1995)

04/03/1995

3

COMPLAINT nunc pro tunc 3-23-95 (nmt) (Entered: 04/04/1995)

04/20/1995

4

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Ricky Mikells 4/17/95Answer due on 6/16/95 for Ricky Mikells (lsg) (Entered: 04/20/1995)

06/14/1995

5

ANSWER to Complaint by Ricky Mikells (Attorney Thomas J. Mahoney Jr.,Emily Elizabeth Garrard), (lsg) (Entered: 06/15/1995)

06/14/1995

6

ANSWER to Local Rule 8.6 Interrogatories by Ricky Mikells (lsg) (Entered:06/15/1995)

06/14/1995

7

CERTIFICATE pursuant to Local Rule 1.6. by defendant Ricky Mikells (lsg)(Entered: 06/15/1995)

06/14/1995

SCHEDULING NOTICE setting Summary Judgment deadline on 11/11/95 ;Joining of parties,amending of pleadings by 8/13/95 ; Motion Filing deadline on11/1/95 ; Discovery cutoff 10/12/95 ; Status Report due on 9/12/95 ; copiesserved. (lsc) (Entered: 07/26/1995)

07/03/1995

8

MOTION by Ricky Mikells for order authorizing affidavit of TidelandsEmployee, Erma Lee with brief in support. (dks) (Entered: 07/05/1995)

07/25/1995

9

ORDER granting [8-1] motion for order authorizing affidavit of TidelandsEmployee, Erma Lee ( signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith ); copies served.(lsc) (Entered: 07/25/1995)

08/01/1995

10

MOTION by Ricky Mikells to Compel discovery with brief in support. (dks)(Entered: 08/01/1995)

08/29/1995

11

ORDER granting [10-1] motion to Compel discovery ( signed by MagistrateJudge G. R. Smith ) Pl is Ordered to serve discovery responses w/i 10 days;copies served. (lsg) (Entered: 08/29/1995)

09/12/1995

12

MOTION by Ricky Mikells to Dismiss Complaint with brief in support. (lsc)(Entered: 09/13/1995)

09/12/1995

13

MEMORANDUM by Ricky Mikells in support of [12-1] motion to DismissComplaint by Ricky Mikells (lsc) (Entered: 09/13/1995)

09/12/1995

14

UNILATERAL STATUS REPORT by dft Ricky Mikells (lsc) (Entered:09/13/1995)

09/12/1995

15

RESPONSE TO ORDER by plaintiff Michael Anthony Bright in reference to[11-1] order (dks) (Entered: 09/14/1995)

09/15/1995

16

ORDER directing pltf to respond to dft's interrogatories and request forproduction, set Discovery deadline to 10/15/95 ( signed by Magistrate Judge G,R. Smith ); copies served. (lsc) (Entered: 09/15/1995)

09/28/1995

17

ANSWER to Local Rule 8.6 Interrogatories by Michael Anthony Bright (dks)(Entered: 10/05/1995)

10/04/1995

18

ORDER directing dft to advise court of intentions regarding dft's motion todismiss, set Notice of Compliance deadline to 10/14/95 ( signed by MagistrateJudge G. R. Smith ); copies served. (lsc) Modified on 10/05/1995 (Entered:10/05/1995)

10/11/1995

18

AMENDED MOTION by Ricky Mikells to Dismiss referring to [12-1] motionto Dismiss Complaint by Ricky Mikells (lsg) (Entered: 10/11/1995)

10/16/1995

19

MOTION by Michael Anthony Bright for Protective Order with brief in support.(nmt) Modified on 10/16/1995 (Entered: 10/16/1995)

10/27/1995

20

RESPONSE by Ricky Mikells to [19-1] motion for Protective Order by MichaelAnthony Bright (dks) (Entered: 10/27/1995)

10/31/1995

21

ORDER denying [19-1] motion for Protective Order ( signed by MagistrateJudge G. R. Smith ); copies served. (bcw) (Entered: 10/31/1995)

11/07/1995

22

MOTION by Ricky Mikells for Summary Judgment with brief in support. (dks)(Entered: 11/08/1995)

11/07/1995

23

MEMORANDUM by Ricky Mikells in support of [22-1] motion for SummaryJudgment by Ricky Mikells (dks) (Entered: 11/08/1995)

11/07/1995

24

STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS by defendant Ricky Mikells in supportof [22-1] motion for Summary Judgment by Ricky Mikells (dks) (Entered:11/08/1995)

11/07/1995

NOTICE issued re: [22-1] motion for Summary Judgment (dks) (Entered:11/08/1995)

11/08/1995

25

MOTION by Michael Anthony Bright for Summary Judgment with brief insupport. (dks) (Entered: 11/09/1995)

11/08/1995

26

RESPONSE TO ORDER by plaintiff Michael Anthony Bright in reference to[21-1] order (dks) (Entered: 11/09/1995)

11/13/1995

27

RESPONSE by Ricky Mikells to [25-1] motion for Summary Judgment byMichael Anthony Bright (dks) (Entered: 11/13/1995)

11/16/1995

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith todeny Re: [25-1] motion for Summary Judgment; Motion no longer referred;copies served. Objections to R and R due by 12/4/95 (nmt) (Entered:11/17/1995)

11/16/1995

29

ORDER that R/R be served upon pltf and cnsl for deft. ( signed by MagistrateJudge G. R. Smith ); copies served. (nmt) (Entered: 11/17/1995)

11/17/1995

30

RESPONSE by Michael Anthony Bright to [22-1] motion for SummaryJudgment by Ricky Mikells (lsc) (Entered: 11/22/1995)

11/27/1995

31

OBJECTION by Michael Anthony Bright to [28-1] report and recommendations(dks) (Entered: 11/27/1995)

12/06/1995

32

ORDER adopting the Magistrate's R/R and denying [25-1] motion for SummaryJudgment ( signed by Chief Judge B. Avant Edenfield ); copies served. (bcw)(Entered: 12/06/1995)

03/01/1996

33

DEFENDANT'S UNILATERAL PROPOSED PRETRIAL ORDER (dks)Modified on 03/01/1996 (Entered: 03/01/1996)

03/14/1996

Notice of change of address by Michael Bright, new address: P.O. Box 310Valdosta, GA 31603 (bcw) (Entered: 03/14/1996)

03/25/1996

34

ORDER granting [22-1] motion for Summary Judgment ( signed by Chief JudgeB. Avant Edenfield ); copies served. (dks) (Entered: 03/25/1996)

03/25/1996

35

JUDGMENT for Ricky Mikells against Michael Anthony Bright, case isdismissed with prejudice; copies served. (dks) (Entered: 03/25/1996)

03/25/1996

Case closed (dks) (Entered: 03/25/1996)

07/10/1998

Record transfered to the FRC. Group #021, Accession # 98-0111, Box # 36,Location #1-005-55-7-1(jgb) Modified on 9/18/2008 (mah). (Entered:07/10/1998)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bright v. Corizon Health Corp.
(Dec 18, 2015)