Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Rosita ORTIZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Dominga Nie

PER CURIAM.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from order (David B. Cohen, J.), entered July 27, 2015, dismissed, without costs.

Inasmuch as plaintiff-appellant failed to submit opposition papers to the underlying motion, the resulting order was entered upon plaintiff's default within the meaning of CPLR 5511 and is therefore nonappealable (see Benitez v. Olson, 29 AD3d 503 [2006]; Fox v. T.B.S.D., Inc., 278 A.D.2d 612 [2000], lv denied, 96 N.Y.2d 716 [2001] ). Plaintiff's remedy was to move to vacate the default (see Figiel v. Met Food, 48 AD3d 330 [2008] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Ortiz v. Lanzo
(Jan 4, 2016)