Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ISAAC MARK RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE HEREDIA, J. BEAIRD, Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The Chief Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Conclusions of Law on February 1, 2016 (Doc. 32) in which she recommended that Defendants' Martinez Report (Doc. 24), which she construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment, be granted, that Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 27) be denied, and that Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 22) be denied. The proposed findings notify the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do so waives appellate review. As of today, no objections have been filed and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Conclusions of Law (Doc. 32) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendants' Martinez Report, construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24), is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED;
5. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and
6. A Final Order pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be entered dismissing Plaintiff's action with prejudice.






/s/_________


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Ramirez v. Heredia
(Mar 1, 2016)