Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Paul W. AKER, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Diane C. NEIBER, f.k.a. Diane C. Aker, Defendant and Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Amy M. Clark, Wahpeton, N.D., and John M. Wilka, Sioux Falls, S.D ., for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.

Samuel S. Johnson, Wahpeton, N.D., for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Paul Aker appeals a district court order denying his motion to amend parenting time. Aker claims the ongoing conflict between the parties constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting modification, and amending parenting time is in the best interests of the children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in finding no material change of circumstances warranting modification of parenting time.

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, and DANIEL J. CROTHERS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Aker v. Neiber
(Mar 3, 2016)