AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. TRIET TRAN, ROY SEO, and YUNJU KANG, Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#63) on March 30, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Plaintiff's Motion (#59) for Summary Judgment and declare Plaintiff has no obligation to issue benefits to Defendants Triet Tran, Roy Seo, and Yunju Kang under the terms of Plaintiff's insurance contract, if any, with Yen Thi Ngo. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#63). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion (#59) for Summary Judgment and DECLARES Plaintiff has no obligation to issue benefits to Tran, Seo, and Kang under the terms of Plaintiff's insurance contract, if any, with Ngo.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of May, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown


ANNA J. BROWN


United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Tran
(May 2, 2016)