Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSHUA MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. AMATO, Sheriff; MICHAEL FRANKO, Jail Administrator, Defendants.

Thomas J. McAvoy

THOMAS J. McAVOY
Senior United States District Judge


DECISION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred by this Court to the Hon. Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). In his June 18, 2013 Report-Recommendation and Order, Magistrate Judge Hummel recommends that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 23) be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. # 23] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In this regard, the motion is

1. GRANTED with respect to Mendez's claims regarding his condition of confinement, access to the law library and counsel, and freedom to practice his religion, and these claims are dismissed; and

2. DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Mendez v. Amato
(Sep 17, 2013)