Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Peter D. O'CONNELL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS, BUREAU OF ELECTIONS, and Michigan Department of State, Defendants–Appellees.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is treated as an application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2016 judgment of the Court of

Appeals. The application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

O'Connell v. Dir. of Elections
(Sep 1, 2016)