Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In Re: DAVID LEWIS, Petitioner.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:11-cr-00229-F-8; 5:14-cv-00374-F) Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lewis, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Lewis petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the court dismissed the § 2255 motion and dismissed as moot Lewis' motion for adjudication of the § 2255 motion by order dated July 18, 2016. Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Lewis' motions, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Lewis
(Sep 1, 2016)