AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

DAVID HACKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BELMONT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants.

Magistrate Judge Jolson

Judge James L. Graham
Magistrate Judge Jolson
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiffs have filed a renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint, seeking to "join an additional party" and "remove certain claims." (Doc. 34 at 1). Plaintiffs indicate that Defendants do not oppose the motion. (Id.). Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that, when a party must seek leave of court to amend a pleading, "[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires." For good cause shown, and in light of the federal policy in favor of liberal amendment, the unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. 34). The Clerk should file Exhibit A to Doc. 34 as the amended complaint. In light of the filing of the amended complaint, the Court recommends that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be DENIED as MOOT (Doc. 18).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 6, 2016

/s/ Kimberly A. Jolson


KIMBERLY A. JOLSON


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hacker v. Belmont Cnty. Comm'rs
(Sep 6, 2016)