Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WESLEY GENE HOLLAND APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge

APPEAL FROM THE CLEVELAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 13CR-2014-48-5] HONORABLE DAVID W. TALLEY, JR., JUDGE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge

Wesley Gene Holland appeals his convictions of second-degree sexual assault and residential burglary. On appeal, Holland argues that the circuit court erred in denying his directed-verdict motions. We cannot address the merits of Holland's appeal because Holland's addendum fails to comply with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2 (2015).

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires an appellant's brief to include an addendum consisting of all documents essential to this court's resolution of the issues on appeal, including exhibits such as CDs and DVDs. Holland's addendum does not comply with this rule. At trial, the State introduced and played audio recordings of two different interviews between Holland and the police. Holland, however, failed to include copies of the audio recordings in his addendum as required by our rules. Because Holland's addendum is inadequate, we order him to file a supplemental addendum within seven days of this opinion. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). We encourage counsel to review our rules, as well as the record and addendum, to ensure that no other deficiencies are present.

Supplemental addendum ordered.

GLADWIN, C.J., and WHITEAKER, J., agree.

N. Mark Klappenbach, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Kathryn Henry, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Holland v. State
(Oct 26, 2016)