Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WAYNE BURWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SCOTT MOODY, Hartford Police Officer, in his indi

FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk

SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court's Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation "summary order"). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 30 day of November, two thousand sixteen. PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges, JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.

Judge John G. Koeltl, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE:

CRISTINA ROUSSEAU (Robin C. Curtis, on the brief) Van Dorn, Curtiss, & Rousseau, PLLC, Orford, NH.

FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS:

JAMES F. CARROLL, English, Carroll & Boe, PC, Middlebury, VT.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Christina Reiss, Chief Judge).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Town of Hartford Police Officers Fredrick Peyton and Kristinnah Adams appeal from an order of the District Court entered on September 14, 2015 denying them qualified immunity. We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Officers Peyton and Adams on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the September 14, 2015 Order of the District Court for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court in its Memorandum and Order filed the same day.

FOR THE COURT:


Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Burwell v. Moody
(Nov 30, 2016)