AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ADVANCED VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., BLACKBERRY LTD, BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, AKA MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendants-Appellees

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Nos. 1:11-cv-06604-CM-RLE, 1:11-cv-08908-CM-RLE, 1:12-cv-00918-CM-RLE, Judge Colleen McMahon.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT WILLIAM MORRIS, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, White Plains, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by OJEIKU CHRISTOPHER AISIKU, THOMAS MARTIN SMITH. HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., also represented by KYLE DAKAI CHEN, MARK R. WEINSTEIN. JEFFRI A. KAMINSKI, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Blackberry LTD, Blackberry Corporation. Also represented by WILLIAM DEAN COSTON; CHRISTOPHER T. LA TESTA, Baltimore, MD. FREDERICK LEE WHITMER, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee Motorola Mobility, LLC. Also represented by AKARSH BELAGODU, Washington, DC; DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, Atlanta, GA; STEVEN MOORE, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 27, 2017


Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner


Peter R. Marksteiner


Clerk of Court

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Advanced Video Techs., LLC v. HTC Corp.
(Feb 27, 2017)