Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 204 IPC corresponding to Section 241 BNS-2023 added later on), and Sections 66-C & 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000,
  • Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC (Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(1) of BNS-2023), (Section 201 IPC corresponding to Section 238 BNS-2023
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 204 IPC corresponding to Section 241 BNS-2023 added later on), and Sections 66-C & 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000,
  • Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC (Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(1) of BNS-2023), (Section 201 IPC corresponding to Section 238 BNS-2023
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    MUSHTAQ ALIAS MUSTAK MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF HARYANA

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

    (213) CRM-M-28361-2026

    Mushtaq @ Mustak Mohammad ……Petitioner(s)

    Versus State of Haryana

    ……Respondent(s)

    Decided on : 22.05.2026 Date of uploading: 22.05.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

    Present: Mr. Harish Rana and Ms. Nisha Rana, Advocates

    for the petitioner (s). Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana.

    ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant

    of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No. 49 dated 03.07.2024,

    registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC (Sections 316(2),

    318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(1) of BNS-2023), (Section 201 IPC

    corresponding to Section 238 BNS-2023 deleted later on and Section 204 IPC

    corresponding to Section 241 BNS-2023 added later on), and Sections 66-C &

    66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000, at Police Station Cyber Crime,

    District Panchkula.

    2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for

    sometime, seeks to withdraw the petition in hand, at this stage.

    3. Ordered accordingly.

    (SUMEET GOEL) May 22, 2026 JUDGE Naveen

    Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

      1. naveen.nagpal01@gmail.com
      2. 2026-05-22T14:19:25+0530
      3. HIgh Court Chandigarh
      4. NAVEEN NAGPAL
      5. I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MUSHTAQ ALIAS MUSTAK MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF HARYANA
    (May 22, 2026)