Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • sections 399, 402 of IPC and 25/54/59 of Arms Act,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • sections 399, 402 of IPC and 25/54/59 of Arms Act,
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    RAJAT KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

    302

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

    AT CHANDIGARH

    CCCCRRRRMMMM----MMMM----22224444888877779999----2222000022224444 DECIDED ON: 04.08.2026

    RRRRAAAAJJJJAAAATTTT KKKKUUUUMMMMAAAARRRR .....PETITIONER

    VERSUS

    SSSSTTTTAAAATTTTEEEE OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB .....RESPONDENT

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

    Present: Ms. Darshanjot Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    Mr. Gurpartap Singh, AAG, Punjab.

    SSSSAAAANNNNJJJJAAAAYYYY VVVVAAAASSSSHHHHIIIISSSSTTTTHHHH ,,,, JJJJ ((((OOOORRRRAAAALLLL))))

    1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, for quashing

    of the PO order dated 12.09.2023 (Annexure P-8) and subsequent

    proceedings, arising out of FIR No.130 dated 04.06.2021, under sections

    399, 402 of IPC and 25/54/59 of Arms Act, at Police Station Basti

    Jodhewal, Ludhiana.

    2. On the very outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that

    since, petitioner has already surrendered before the concerned Court, and

    thereupon, again, released on bail by the trial Court, present petition can be

    disposed of, as the same having been rendered infructuous.

    3. In this regard, counsel for the petitioner produces copy of the

    order dated 24.05.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,

    Ludhiana, and same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same

    at the appropriate place on the file.

    4. In view of the above, present petition stands disposed of, as the

    same having been rendered infructuous.

    (SANJAY VASHISTH)

    00004444....00008888....2222000022226666 JJJJUUUUDDDDGGGGEEEE Lavisha

    Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

      1. Lavisha67168@gmail.com
      2. 2026-08-04T14:24:45+0530
      3. PHHC, Chandigarh
      4. LAVISHA
      5. I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    RAJAT KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB
    (Aug 4, 2026)