AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Anantram v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

    PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 562 of 2026

    Court No. - 1

    HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

    1. Heard.

    2. The land on which the petitioner wants the chak road to be constructed

    and continued i.e. Gata No. 420 situated in village Bhaduwa Somvansi,

    Pargana, Tehsil & District- Gonda, is banjar land.

    3. On being asked, as to how, we can direct a banjar land to be utilized for

    construction of a chak marg, no answer could be given. The matter

    involves change of category of land and its use, therefore, we asked, the

    counsel for the petitioner as to under which provision this can be done

    and who is competent to do it, no answer was forthcoming.

    4. In view of the above, we decline to interfere in the matter in the

    aforesaid circumstances

    5. The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of with liberty to pursue

    other remedies, if any, available in law. 

    July 6, 2026 Satish

    Versus

    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikram Dutt Pandey, Dharmendra Kumar Gupta

    Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta

    (Manjive Shukla,J.)    (Rajan Roy,J.)

    Anantram .....Petitioner(s)

    State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

      1. 2026-07-08T11:40:21+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Anantram v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others
    (Jul 6, 2026)