Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    S. CHETAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    - 1 -

    HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53139-DB WP No. 11239 of 2023

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 15THDAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

    PRESENT

    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

    AND

    THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

    WRIT PETITION NO. 11239 OF 2023 (KLGP)

    BETWEEN:

    1. S. CHETAN KUMAR

    S/O LATE T.M. SHIVASHANKAR

    AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,

    SECRETARY COSMOPOLITAN CLUB, TIPTUR,

    5THMAIN, K.R. EXTENSION,

    TIPTUR - 572 201.

    2. C.N.HARIBABU

    S/O LATE C.B. NAGARAJ,

    AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

    DODDAPETE,

    TIPTUR - 572 201.

    3. M.N.SHIVANANDA,

    S/O LATE. M.S. NEELAKANTASWAMY,

    AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

    KEREKODI CIRCLE, B.H. ROAD,

    TIPTUR - 572 201.

    4. G. NANDAKUMAR,

    S/O LATE. K.M. GURUPADAPPA,

    AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

    - 2 -

    DODDAPET,

    TIPTUR - 572 201. …PETITIONERS

    (BY SRI. GOUTHAM A. R., ADVOCATE)

    AND:

    1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

    DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

    VIDHAN SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

    BANGALORE - 560 001.

    2. H.G. KUMARSWAMY

    S/O GANGADHARAIAH,

    AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

    NO.411, VINAYAKA NAGAR,

    B.H. ROAD,

    TIPTUR - 572 201.

    3. TAHSILDAR

    TIPTUR TALUK,

    TIPTUR - 572 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S.ARUNA, HCGP FOR R1 & R3;

    R2 SERVED)

    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226

    READ WITH 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

    PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINANT AND TO 1. QUASH

    ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LAND GRABBING

    PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURTS (COURT HALL 01) IN No. 30/2023 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G. 2. TO PASS SUCH

    OTHER ORDER, RELIEFs OR ORDERS DEEMED FIT AND PROPER

    - 3 -

    IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ABOVE PETITION,

    IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. 3. GRANT SUCH

    OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE

    CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF

    JUSTICE.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

    IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

    UNDER:

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and

    HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

    ORAL ORDER

    (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) This writ petition has been filed to impugn the order dated 01.04.2023 and the entire proceedings pending before the Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Courts (CH-

    1) at Bangalore in L.G.C.(G) No. 30 of 2023.

    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are former members of the governing body of the Cosmopolitan Club. The Club itself, registered as a society since 1934, is not impleaded as a party to the proceedings. He contends that since the Club is a body

    - 4 -

    corporate, it is the present managing committee that is duty-bound to answer the allegations of land grabbing, not the ex-members in their individual capacity.

    3. He therefore submits that in the absence of the Cosmopolitan Club as a party, the complaint is not maintainable.

    4. Having considered the substance of the submissions, we find merit in this contention. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the following direction:

    5. The concerned Land Grabbing Court is directed to implead the Cosmopolitan Club, Tiptur Taluk, as a necessary party respondent in L.G.C.(G) No. 30 of 2023. The Court shall issue notice to the Club to respond to the allegations regarding the land grabbing of 2 acres and 20 guntas of government land.

    6. Thereafter, if the Court considers the presence of the present petitioners necessary, it may issue fresh

    - 5 -

    summons to them. All contentions of both sides are kept open.

    7. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

    (D K SINGH)

    JUDGE

    (TARA VITASTA GANJU)

    JUDGE

    TIN

    List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    S. CHETAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
    (Dec 15, 2025)