Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2025 PHHC 88016-DB
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2025 PHHC 88016-DB
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    NIPPUN MITTAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

    CHANDIGARH

    119 CWP-19025-2025 (O&M)

    Date of Decision:-11.07.2025

    Pritpal Singh ...Petitioner Vs.

    Union of India & ors. ...Respondents

    CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

    Present: Mr. Avneet Singh, Advocates for the petitioner.

    Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing counsel with Ms. Nikita Garg, Jr. Standing counsel for the respondents.

    ***

    SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

    1. Challenge in the present petition is to notice dated 05.04.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'Act 1961'); notice dated 13.03.2024 issued under Section 148 A (b) of the Act, 1961; order dated 05.04.2024 issued under Section 148 A (d) of the Act, 1961 and all consequential actions, for AY 2020-2021.

    2.

    Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others (CWP No. 21509-2023 and other connected matters), decided on

    29.07.2024.

    3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has also not

    1 of 2

    disputed the same.

    4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case.

    5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 05.04.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961; notice dated 13.03.2024 issued under Section

    148 A (b) of the Act, 1961; order dated 05.04.2024 issued under Section 148 A (d) of the Act, 1961 and all consequential actions, for AY 2020-2021 , on the ground that the Issuing Authority had no jurisdiction to issue the same, in view of the circular/notification dated 29.03.2022 of the CBDT, wherein, it has been specifically enumerated that the NFAC has exclusive power to issue the notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961.

    6. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinder Singh Bhangu's case (supra) and Jasjit Singh's case (supra), allowed the writ petitions on the same issue, as raised in the present writ petition, by granting liberty to the revenue to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised.

    7. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of, in terms of Jatinder Singh Bhangu's case (supra), decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh's case (supra), decided on 29.07.2024.

    8. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

    (LISA GILL) (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)

    JUDGE JUDGE

    11.07.2025

    Gaurav Arora Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

    2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    NIPPUN MITTAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
    (Jul 11, 2025)