Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2025 JHHC 13004
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 325, 302 of the Indian Penal Code
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2025 JHHC 13004
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 325, 302 of the Indian Penal Code
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    MANU SINGH ALIAS MANUK GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

    2025:JHHC:13004

    1

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5820 of 2024

    ------

    1.Manu Singh @ Manuk Ganjhu, aged about 34 years, son of late Shanichar Ganjhu

    2.Naresh Ganjhu @ Naresh Singh @ Chhotu Singh, son of

    Laxman Singh 3.Bhola Singh, son of Laxman Ganjhu

    Sl. No. 1 to 3 all are resident of village Bengwatari, PO and PS

    Bashishtha Nagar, District Chatra, Jharkhand

    4.Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Ganjhu, son of Khiru Singh, resident

    of village Kumbhi, PO and PS Barachatti, District Gaya, Bihar

    … … Petitioners

    Versus

    The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party

    ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

    ------

    For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P.

    -----

    05/ 30.04.2025

    Heard the parties.

    2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the

    Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been

    preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences

    registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 325, 302 of the

    Indian Penal Code in connection with Bashishtha Nagar PS Case

    No. 64 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial

    Magistrate, Chatra.

    3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer

    for anticipatory bail.

    4. This is a case of mob lynching. The petitioners are the

    part of mob in which one Vijay Ganjhu has been lynched who

    killed Lakhan Singh Bhokta.

    5. Considering the nature of allegation, this is not a fit case

    of grant of anticipatory bail to this petitioner.

    6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is

    dismissed.

    (ANANDA SEN, J.)

    Tanuj/Cp-3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MANU SINGH ALIAS MANUK GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
    (Apr 30, 2025)