Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Pradeep Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

    Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25494-DB

    Court No. - 29

    Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39464 of 2024

    Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mir Sayed,Rahul Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

    Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

    1. Petitioner claims to have applied for registration of a

    hotel u/s 3 of the Sarais Act, 1867. It is alleged that such

    application of the petitioner has remained pending. A

    representation made on 18.11.2024 has also not been

    considered and hence this writ petition.

    2. Learned Standing Counsel states that grievance of the

    petitioner would be got examined by the concerned

    respondent i.e. respondent no.2.

    3. In the facts of the case, we permit the petitioner to

    approach respondent no.2 annexing all materials

    including the previous application made for registration of

    hotel, together with a copy of this order, before

    respondent no.2. Such claim of the petitioner would be

    accorded consideration, in accordance with law, within a

    further period of two months.

    4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is

    disposed of.

    Order Date :- 21.2.2025 S.Chaurasia

      1. 2025-02-21T15:26:00+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Pradeep Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
    (Feb 21, 2025)