Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2025 KER 10229
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2025 KER 10229
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    SHAFEENA v. STATE OF KERALA

    W.P.(Crl) No.144/2025

    1

    2025:KER:10229

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

    FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 / 18TH MAGHA, 1946

    WP(CRL.) NO. 144 OF 2025

    CRIME NO.771/2017 OF Kuzhalmannam Police Station, Palakkad

    IN SC NO.59 OF 2018 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT

    (ADHOC) III, PALAKKAD

    PETITIONER:

    SHAFEENA, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O RASHEED, DAFFORDIL

    HOUSE, SAINAAS COTTAGE, MAHALI ROAD,

    MUTTIKULANGARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678594

    BY ADVS. P.K.VARGHESE

    M.T.SAMEER

    DHANESH V.MADHAVAN

    JERRY MATHEW

    LLOYD JOHN

    DEVIKA K.R.

    RESPONDENTS:

    1 STATE OF KERALA

    REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY OF HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT

    SECRATARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL

    SERVICES, AIL HEADQUARTERS, POOJAPURA,

    THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012

    3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON AND

    CORRECTIONAL HOME, THAVANOOR, PIN - 679571

    SRI. M.P. PRASANTH, PP

    THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR

    ADMISSION ON 07.02.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

    DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

    1

    2

    JUDGMENT

    The petitioner is the wife of the convict who is undergoing imprisonment at the Central Prison and Correctional Home, Thavanoor. The petitioner's father/father-in-law of the convict underwent a surgery and he is hospitalised at Avitis Super Specialty Hospital, Palakkad. An application for emergency leave submitted by the petitioner was rejected as per Ext.P2 order by the 3rdrespondent on the ground that the application is not supported by the certificate of a Civil Surgeon. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court.

    2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Prosecutor Sri. M.P. Prasanth.

    3. Ext.P1 medical certificate would show that the father of the petitioner underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy on 17.1.2025. It is submitted that the father of the petitioner is still in hospital. In these circumstances, there is no point in insisting for a certificate by the Civil Surgeon, inasmuch as the father of the petitioner cannot go before a Civil Surgeon to get medical certificate. Hence, the 3rdrespondent is directed to take a decision based on the medical certificate

    3

    issued by the doctor who treated the petitioner's father. The petitioner is free to produce any other medical records before the 3rdrespondent. The 3rdrespondent shall take a decision on the application for emergency leave of the convict within five days from the date of the receipt of the copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 3rdrespondent for compliance.

    The writ petition is disposed of as above.

    Sd/-

    DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

    JUDGE

    kp

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    SHAFEENA v. STATE OF KERALA
    (Feb 7, 2025)