Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Smt. Jaya Prada Nahata v. M/s. Vaibhavi Infraa Projects

    133741

    IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

    AT HYDERABAD

    FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY

    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

    ARBITRATION APPLICATIO N NO: 124 OF 2024

    Between:

    1. MTS PUTHANA SHOBHA RAN|, c/o. purHANA KRTSHNA MOHAN REDDY, 9q9d^apo^ut !! years, Occupation private Emptoyee, R/o. Ftai No iiii, irt;t N"572, sri s_ai Kuteer, Road No 4/3A. Mathrusri r.r5gai, Nea.. sei, -A/iy"-prr,tc Miyapur, PO Miyapur, District- Medchat_ Matkajgiii, fetangana-'S0dO?S. ' ' '

    2. [VITs PUTHANA SUSIflTHA, C/o pUTHANA KRTSHNA MOHAN REDDY, aged about 3_0 years, Occupation private Employee, R/o. Fi"i N" ;d6, 5 N" 118 and 119, Urban County, tndira Nagai, (fC frnu, Coif,iOoi,lilpO Gachibowli, Dist K V Rangareddy, Telangan"a_ bOOOgZ.

    3 Mrs. PUTHANA SUJ|THA, D/o pUTHANA KRISHNA MOHAN REDDy. aoed 3l9lt39I9?*r.Ocrupation Housewife, R/o B_ 3_ 224Nai_ bs, Ft"t N; D:),Vora towers, Madhra Nag^ar, S^anjeeva Reddy Nagar, Opp Reliance Fresh,Hyderabad, Telanagana- 5b0038.

    4. Mrs. MANNURU SUNANDA, Wo. M MASTAN REDDY, aged about 53 years, Occupation Housewife, R/o Flat No .103, Madhavi CtrriiE, f_fr"rrrn fir'g';r,[t/anikonda, Hyderabad, Telangana_ 500089

    5. fi/rs PARVArH| KUPPTREDDT, wo RAMASUBBA REDDYKUPPTREDDT, aged. about 7r years, occupation private Emproyee, nro. 7- rso7i, noLJr.ro'1, ^Nagendra

    Nagar, Habisiguda, Secundera5ad,'HyderabrJ,- t"l;;;;;;_

    500007.

    6 Mrs. NELATUR| VENKATA SUPRAJA, D/o GOptREDDy SUBBA REDDY aged. lPout 47 years, Occupation private Employee, Ab-ihiCl, Gh";iRoad, Prodduturi, Kadapa, and Andhra pradeshl 5i6360.

    7. MTs. VULAVALA SRAVANTHI, Wo. BoJJA MURALIDHARENDRA REDDY, aged.about 55 years, Occupation private Emptoyee, Ato. iZnlnite, itat-No

    401,

    ^V^engatrao Nagar, lndia prastaApts, SR ndgai, HyOeraUiO, i;ir"g;;;_

    500038

    8. MT HARI PRASAD REDDY NAGA, S/o. S|VA SANKAR REDDY NAGA. aoed about 44 years, Occupertion private Employee, R/o FIai frfo iOZ, 3fe Res.idency, Sai Keerthi Enclave, Near Rajiv Grui-rakalpa, fVirrrp"iVilt"-o:

    Quthubullahpur Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana_ 500085

    9. Mrs. NOOKA SUBHASHIN|, S/o. SESHA REDDY GAD|, aged about 40 years, Occupation Private Employee, R/o. H No 7_ 1_ F_ +i] p"nif.,*rU.,-i loJony, Manikonda, Near Mana-Studio, puppalaguda, K V'n*g;rul?y,

    Telangana- 500089.

    l

    ;

    I

    I

    I

    I

    i

    10.lvlrs. I\,4UKKA VISHNU PRIYA, D/o MUKKA VENKATA REDDY' aged about

    28 vears occupatton' ijii,itJ

    -Ernprovu" R/o #'1-63' Nl ukkavariPalli'

    CuOciapafr Andhrb Pradesh- 5'161 0B

    ...APPLICANTS/F'ETITIONERS

    AND

    SAHITI INFRATEC VENTURES INDIA PRIVATE LltV|TED a registered Partnership Firm having its'p"tinlip'f pl'Ce of business at Plot No 1222-' ^H

    NO

    'e:')i ;s\ia2iNibi ?q.i[;ih "no6'. no'o rug g6' Jubiree l'rlls' 500'033 Telanqana State, Repres"",it"O UV- lt. Authorised Sionatorv Eathamokkala Bhaskar Naidu, s/o pr"o]i,|i}i#N;'d' E;ih;;"krati Aseo l:1 vears'-R/o Ptot No. 1222,41h loor.. drtiii's1Jt'hi;. R;aoNg 3.6 Jublie; Hiilscheck Post'

    i'r,iri rt r;it- nlir*iv Stationl Jrori* nirti Hvderabad' Telan g ana s 10033

    ...RESPONDENT

    Arbitration Application f iled under Section11 (6) of Ar bitrationand ConciliationAct,lgg6schemeforappointmentofArbitrators,lgg,3prayingthat thisHon,bleCoUrtmaybepleasedtoappointSolearbitratorundersectionll(6) oftheArbitration&ConciliationAct,lgg6'toenterintoreferenceandadjudicate uponthedisputesanddifferencesbetweentheApplicantandthellespondentin respect of or arising of the Agreement of Sale dated 02 1 1 2021

    .

    Counsel for the APP|icants

    : Ms. V. SoubhagYa Vali, represents Sri. V Seetharama Avadhani Counsel for the Respondents : None appeared The Gourt made the following:

    2

    THE HON'BLE THE CHTEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. L24 of 2024

    ORDER..

    Ms. V. Soubharya Va-Ili, learned counsel represents Mr. V. Seetharama Avadhani, learned counsel for the applicants.

    2. None appears on behalf of the respondent though served.

    3. This application is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the parties.

    4. Facts giving rise to frling of this application briefly stated are that the parties have entered into Memorandum of Understanding dated O2.IL.2O2L. Clause 12 of the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding contains an arbitration clause, which is extracted below for the facility of reference:

    3

    )

    "ln case ofany dispute arise betrveenthe parties, have to settle amicabte in the event ofany failure to settle the dispute or difference shallbe referred to the arbitrator and the arbitreLtion proceedings will be conducted according tothe provisions of the Indian Arbitration and Concilizttion Act, 1996. The arbitration award willbe binding upon the both the parties and hnal' The place o[ the arbitration will be at Hyderabad and proceedings will be in English."

    5. The applicants sent legal notice dated 22'05 2023to the respondent, but the respondent failed to respond tothe a-foresaid notice.

    6. Dispute has arisen between the parties which requires resolution in the malner agreed to by the parties

    7. A Bench of this Court by an order dated O2 O2'2O24 passed in Arbitration Application No'156 of 2023 between the same pa-rties has appointed Dr' Justice lihameem Akther, a former Judge of this Court as sole arbitratorto adjudicate the dispute between the parties'

    8. Therefore, inthe _instant case also, Dr' Justice Shameem Akther, a former Judge of this Court (rr:sident of

    4

    3

    Flat No.6F, Sixth Floor, Mayfair Apartment, Block_B, H.No.8-2-269l3lMFlF-6, Road No.2, Baajara Hills, Sri Nagar Colony, Hyderabad-34; Mobile No.8331998534), is appointed as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

    9

    Accordingly, the arbitration application is allowed. Miscellareous applications pending, if any, shall stald closed. No order as to costs.

    //TRUE COPYII

    SD/- K SRINIVASA RAO,

    JotNr REGts/RAR.

    rl

    SECTION OFFICERTo,

    1

    Dr' Justice shameem Akther, former Judge of High court for the state ofTelangana (resident of Flat No. 6F, Sixth Ftoor, fUJyfair Apartmeni, B;;k B: H. No. B-2-269l3tMFtF-6,.Rga-d No 2, Banjara Hitt., Sri N"d; C;ilry;Hyderabad - 34, Mobite N^o. 8331998534) (atong with a copy"oi "ffi;;rii and material papers) (By Special messenger) - One CC to Sri. V. Seetharama Avadhani, Advocate tOpUCITwo CD Copies 2 DL

    3

    T

    1

    I

    I

    HIGH COURT

    DATED:1210712024

    ORDER

    HE SI

    , ---\-/\ rt_ - { /\

    \

    /...

    ::il.,

    .:.";

    o

    o 2] lut ?$2[ /.,/

    * 7

    ARBAPPL.No'124 ot2O24

    ARBITRATION APPLICATION IS ALLOWED

    oaist r',

    5

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Smt. Jaya Prada Nahata v. M/s. Vaibhavi Infraa Projects
    (Jul 12, 2024)