Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Baindla Sankaramma v. The State of Telangana

    [ 31681

    HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

    AT HYDERABAD

    (Special Originat Jurisdiction)

    MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY

    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

    WRIT PETITION NO: 17719 OF 2024

    Between:

    Baindla Sankaramma, Wo Late Venkataiah Aged about 63 years, Occ, Agriculture R/o 1-1 1 Maddur village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy district

    ...PETITIONER

    AND

    1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad.

    2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Ranga Reddy

    3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Revenue Division Chevella, Ranga Reddy Diskict.

    4. The Tahsildar /Joint Sub-Registrar, Shabad Mandal Shabad, Ranga Reddy district

    ...RESP.NDENT'

    Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declare the action of the respondents in including the petitioner land an extent of A e 0-18 guntas in Sy.No. 238/E situated at Madder village Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy district is illegal, arbitrary,and contrary to the Provisions of Telangana State Rights in Land and Pattadarpass book Act 2020(Act I of 2020) and rules made therein and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and same is liable to be set aside and consequently direct the respondents to delete the petitioners land an extent of Ac. 0-18 guntas in Sy.No. 238/E situated at Maddur village Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy district from the Prohibitory Listin the Dharani Portal.

    1

    lA NO: 1

    oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circ,mstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents 2 to ,r to derete the petitioner rand an extent of Ac. 0-18 guntas in sy.No. 238/E situated at Maddur viflage shabad Mandar, Ran3a Reddy district in the Prohibitory list perding disposal of the Writ petition.

    Counsel for the petiticner: SRI KASU BAL REDDY

    Counsel for the Resp,rndents: SRI SOMU SnflffVAS REDDY, AGp FOR

    REVENUE

    The Court made the foltowing: ORDER

    2

    HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No

    -177L9 of 20.24

    ORAL ORDER:

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and SriSomu Srinivas Reddy, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue

    2. The petitioner herein is claiming that she is the absolute ownerand possessor of land admeasuring Ac'0- 1 8 gts in Sy'No'238/E' situated at Maddur village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' She is also owner of land in other survey numbers of the very same village. In proof of the same, she has filed copy of latest pattadar passbook. According to the petitioner, the subject propertyls mentioned in prohibited list. Therefore, she had submitted online application No.2400008797 dated 1'8'06'2024 with respondent No'2 witha request to delete the subject prope(y from the prohibited list' Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online application' the

    2nd respondent did not act upon the same' Therefore' the present Writ

    Petition.

    3. Whereas, the leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions would submit that the 2nd respondent will

    I

    I

    3

    1

    % \':::

    \consider the sard online application and pass appropr-iate orders in accordance with law.

    4. In the light of the aforesaid submission, thir; \\rrit Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consirler the online application No 2400008797 dated 18.06.2024 subnLitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by putting the petit oner and all effected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. If, the 2'd respondent is not inclLned to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons and pass a reasoned order, communicate copy of the said order to the petitioner and complete the said exercise within a perioc. of eight (08) weeks from the rlate of receipt of a copy of this order. llhere shalt be no order as to col;ts.

    As a sequt:[ thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.';

    :3D/.A.V.S. PRASAD

    //TRUE coPYtt ASsl$TANr *=Rr*o*

    SECTION OFFICER

    IE:l,ffrl:e-cretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat BuildingsHyoe_raDao, :itEte of Telangana. If.^D_i.:IiR1.9, -gl

    lector Ra nd a Reddy District, Ra nga Red d 7 Kevenue urvrsrr:nal officer, chevella Revenue Diiision ctievella, RangaReddy District . T.he Tahsildar /.loint Sub-Registrar, Shabad Mandal Shabad, Ranga Reddy district

    One CC to SRI KASU BAL_REDDY, Advocate tOpUClTwo CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, Hign-Cou?;dr thJ Siate of letangana, at Hyderabad. [O|JT] Two CD Copies

    To

    7

    PSK.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5.

    6

    BS

    HIGH COURT

    DATED:081071',2024

    ORDER

    WP.No.17719 of 2024

    DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

    WITHOUT COSTS.

    br(

    T |t!:s

    '4 t 0.^ \ lir 2r il( ail E *

    3

    '4r(:HEt) \-; t

    e{

    1

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Baindla Sankaramma v. The State of Telangana
    (Jul 8, 2024)