Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Shyam Ranjan Dixit v. Sri Nitin Bansal, D.M., Etawah

    Court No. - 5

    Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3815 of 2015

    Applicant :- Shyam Ranjan Dixit Opposite Party :- Sri Nitin Bansal, D.M., Etawah Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Ashish Pandey

    Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.

    Heard Sri Devesh Vikram, holding brief of Sri Ram Ashish Pandey,

    learned counsel for the applicant.

    Through present contempt application, prayer has been made to punish

    the opposite party for willful disobedience of the order 23.4.2015

    passed by this Court in Writ A No. 32262 of 2001 ( Shyama Ranjan

    Dixit Vs. District Magistrate, Etawah and Others), by which this Court

    has directed the opposite party to return the amount deducted from the

    gratuity of the applicant along with simple interest @ 6% per annum

    within a period of one month from the date of production of certified

    copy of the order of this Court.

    It is stated that a copy of the aforesaid order was served to the opposite

    party on 2.5.2015, but the aforesaid amount has not yet been returned

    to the applicant.

    Prima facie, a case for willful disobedience of the order of this Court

    dated 23.4.2015 passed by this Court in Writ A No. 32262 of 2001 is

    made out.

    Issue notice to the opposite party to show cause as to why charges be

    not framed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for

    punishing the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the order dated

    23.4.2015 passed by this Court in Writ A No. 32262 of 2001.

    List on the date fixed by the Office in the notice. On the next date of

    listing, the opposite party shall remain present before the Court.

    However, in case the order dated 23.4.2015 passed by this Court in Writ

    A No. 32262 of 2001 passed by this Court is complied with on or before

    the date fixed and an affidavit of compliance is filed, the opposite party

    need not to appear before this Court.

    Order Date :- 3.7.2015 Amit Mishra

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Shyam Ranjan Dixit v. Sri Nitin Bansal, D.M., Etawah
    (Jul 3, 2015)