Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC and Section 63/65 Copyright Act, Police Station-
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC and Section 63/65 Copyright Act, Police Station-
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Lachchhi Giri v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others

    Court No. - 64

    Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19092 of 2021

    Applicant :- Lachchhi Giri Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Giri Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

    Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

    Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A and perused the

    record.

    The instant application is being moved by the applicant invoking the powers of Section 438 Cr.P.C. that he has every reason to believe that he may be arrested on the accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence in connection with Case Crime no.556 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC and Section 63/65 Copyright Act, Police Station- Pilkhuwa, District-Hapur.

    From the record, it is evident that the applicant has approached this Court after getting her anticipatory bail rejected from the Court of Session vide order dated 29.10.2021.

    Taking into account the severity of allegations as mentioned in the FIR that the applicant was said to have involve with his son at P.S. Pilkhuwa in manufacturing lubricant oil of "SERVO" brand. Huge quantity of duplicate oil was recovered from the working place of the applicant which requires professional investigation. This Court feels that in order to have indepth probe into the matter, the Investigating Officer of the case should be given fullest liberty to choose its own course for the transparent investigation. Thus, giving a panoramic view of the matter the Court is not inclined to exercise its powers in favour of the applicant, and thus the present anticipatory bail application is hereby REJECTED.

    Order Date :- 5.1.2022 Abhishek Sri.

    Neutral Citation No. - 2022:AHC:1312

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Lachchhi Giri v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others
    (Jan 5, 2022)