Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    MANOJ.N v. STATE OF KERALA

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

    TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945

    WP(C) NO. 34436 OF 2023

    PETITIONER:

    MANOJ.N

    AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, PROPRIETOR, RASIKA SREE MOVIES, 24/920, THYKKADU.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695104

    BY ADVS.

    ZAKEER HUSSAIN

    K.A.SANJEETHA

    MOHAMMED ZAMAN

    RESPONDENTS:

    1 STATE OF KERALA

    GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,

    THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY.

    2 GOVERNMENT SECRETARY

    TAXES (J) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT

    SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001

    3 INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION

    KERALA, EX-MAYOR R BALAKRISHNAN NAIR RD,

    NEAR DISTRICT COURT, VANCHIYOOR,

    THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695035

    4 THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)

    2ND FLOOR, CC 40/1017, PERUMBILLY BUILDINGS,

    OPP. MAHARAJAS COLLEGE GROUND, HEAD POST

    OFFICE.P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682011

    5 FILM DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION (KERALA)

    REG. NO.ERN 480/87, C.C.NO.36/1511, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682018

    REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.

    6 A.A.SIYAD KOKKER

    AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO

    THE PETITIONER, FILM DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION

    (KERALA), REG. NO.ERN 480/87, C.C.NO.36/1511, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682018

    7 M.M.HAMZA

    AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED,

    FILM DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION (KERALA),

    REG. NO.ERN 480/87, C.C.NO.36/1511,

    1

    : 2 :

    CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682018

    8 T.SUBRAMANIAN

    AGED 72 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN

    TO THE PETITIONER, GENERAL SECRETARY, FILM

    DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION(KERALA), REG.

    NO. ERN 480/87, C.C NO.36/1511, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682018

    9 LISTIN STEPHEN

    AGED 37 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO

    THE PETITIONER, PRESIDENT, FILM DISTRIBUTORS

    ASSOCIATION(KERALA), REG. NO. ERN 480/87, C.C NO.36/1511, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682018

    BY ADVS.

    SRI.T.KRISHNANUNNI

    SRI.PRADEESH CHACKO

    SRI.SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE - GP.

    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

    ON 28.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

    FOLLOWING:

    : 3 :

    DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.

    ========================= W.P.(C).No. 34436 of 2023 ========================== Dated this the 28th day of November, 2023

    JUDGMENT

    The petitioner, who is stated to be a distributor of cinematograph films, under the name "M/s.Rasikasree Movies", impels a singular plea that competent Secretary of Government of Kerala be directed to advert to Ext.P7 report and recommendations, made by the District Registrar General, Ernakulam, and initiate appropriate action under Section 25 (1)

    (a) of the Travancore Cochin Literary Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955 (the 'Act', for short).

    2. Smt.K.A.Sanjeetha - learned counsel for the petitioner, pointed out that, obligation of the Government to act as per Ext.P7 is undeniable from the Statutory Scheme, particularly because Ext.P6 report that has been settled by it through the Joint Secretary, (Taxes). She argued that, therefore, refusal of the Government of Kerala to now act upon Ext.P7 is not merely illegal but mala fide. She, therefore, prayed that said Authority be directed to initiate immediate action on Ext.P7 and complete it without any avoidable delay.

    : 4 :

    3. Sri.T.Krishnanunni, learned Senior Counsel, instructed by Sri.Pradeesh Chacko - appearing for respondents 5 to 9, submitted that Ext.P7 cannot be construed to be inviolable, because his clients have already filed objections against the same. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that, therefore, if any action is to be taken by the Government, they will have to hear his clients also.

    4. Sri.Sunil Kumar Kuraikose - learned Government Pleader, in response, conceded that Government has not yet taken any decision on Ext.P7, either under Section 25 of the 'Act' or under any other applicable provisions. He submitted that, therefore, if this Court is so inclined, its competent Authority will take up the said report, adverting to Ext.P6 order and take a final decision thereon.

    5. I have no doubt that afore suggestion of the learned Government Pleader is the best available to both sides in the given circumstances.

    In the afore circumstances, recording the afore submissions of the learned Government Pleader, I allow this writ petition and direct the competent Secretary of Government to take up Ext.P7 and advert to Ext.P6; thus culminating in an

    : 5 :

    appropriate order and necessary action thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after following due procedure.

    Sd/-

    DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

    JUDGE

    anm

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MANOJ.N v. STATE OF KERALA
    (Nov 28, 2023)