Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2023 PHHC 132056
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 406 and 120-B of IPC,
  • Section 173 Cr.P.C.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2023 PHHC 132056
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 406 and 120-B of IPC,
  • Section 173 Cr.P.C.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    GURPREET KAUR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

    AT CHANDIGARH

    105 2023:PHHC:132056

    CWP No.21169 of 2023 Date of Decision:11.10.2023 Gurpreet Kaur

    ….Petitioner

    vs. Union of India and others ….Respondents

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

    Present: Mr. Sunny Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner

    Mr. Pritpal Singh Miglani, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India

    Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab

    ***

    JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

    1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to re-issue her passport.

    2. The petitioner is holding passport dated 19.12.2016 which is valid upto 18.12.2026. The petitioner applied for re-issuance of passport because she lost her passport. There is change in the particulars of the petitioner. The respondents have not re-issued passport because FIR No. 20 dated 13.02.2021, under Sections 406 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Khanna, District Khanna, is pending against the petitioner.

    1 of 2

    CWP No.21169 of 2023 -2- 2023:PHHC:132056

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that police after completing investigation filed cancellation report, however, trial court has asked the police to make further investigation.

    4. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Baljit Singh, submits that it is factually correct that police after completing investigation filed cancellation which was not accepted by trial court and matter has been referred for further investigation and till date no police report under Section

    173 Cr.P.C. has been filed.

    5. Counsel for Union of India submits that in the wake of statement of learned State counsel, case of the petitioner shall be considered and decided in terms of judgment of this Court in Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and others 2023 SCC Online P&H 1391. She further assures the Court that appropriate order shall be passed within six weeks from today.

    6. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.

    7. In the wake of statements of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

    (JAGMOHAN BANSAL)

    JUDGE

    11.10.2023

    paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: Yes/No

    Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:132056

    2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    GURPREET KAUR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
    (Oct 11, 2023)