AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2023 PHHC 99288
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 3-H(4) of the National Highway Act, 1956,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2023 PHHC 99288
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 3-H(4) of the National Highway Act, 1956,
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    PAWAN KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    289 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

    CHANDIGARH

    CWP-4708-2023 Decided on:-02.08.2023

    Pawan Kumar and another ....Petitioners... vs.

    Union of India and others ....Respondents.

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

    Present: Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate, for the petitioners.

    Mr. Navneet Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.2 to 4-State. *****

    HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)

    1. By way of present writ petition, prayer has been made for issuance of directions to respondent No.3 to refer the objections filed at the instance of petitioners-landowners, invoking Section 3-H(4) of the National Highway Act, 1956, seeking apportionment of compensation, before the Reference Court.

    2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Major Gurjinder Singh Benipal, DRO Mohali, submits that the objections dated 13.06.2022 (Annexure P-6) filed at the instance of petitioners shall be forwarded to the Reference Court-cum-Competent Jurisdiction, within a period of 7 days from today.

    3. In view of the above statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to forward the objections dated 13.06.2022 (Annexure P-6) to respondent

    1 of 2

    No.2 within a period of 7 days from today. It is made clear that in case, respondent No.3 fails to comply with the aforesaid direction, the petitioners shall be at liberty to get the present petition revived and the same if required shall be subject to payment of cost of Rs.50,000/- to be paid to the petitioners by respondent No.3 personally.

    02.08.2023 (HARKESH MANUJA)

    sonika JUDGE

    Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No

    Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:099288

    2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    PAWAN KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
    (Aug 2, 2023)