AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    1. Department of Power, Government of Mizoram, Aizwal 2. Secretary, Department of Power, Government of Mizoram, Aizwal

    Pan

    DATE O

    In the m

    D

    energy Govern

    And In the m

    1

    2

    Parties p

    It Despatc surchar of Mizo Commi and Se

    t/Oct/Ord

    CE

    F HEARING

    atter of

    efault in p drawn in ment of M

    atter of

    . Departm

    . Secretary

    resent:

    None

    was noti h Centre ge was ou ram on a ssion in it cretary, D

    er in Petitio

    NTRAL ELE

    Petiti

    : 18.10.20

    ayment access o izoram, Ai ent of Pow , Departm ced from

    (NERLDC

    tstanding ccount

    s order da epartmen

    n No. 158/2

    CTRICITY R

    NEW

    on No. 158 Coram

    1. Dr

    2. Sh

    3. Sh

    4. Sh

    11

    of Unsche f the dra zwal

    er, Gover ent of Po

    O

    the rep ) that a against of arre ted 12.7 t of Pow

    011 (Suo m

    EGULATOR

    DELHI

    /2011 (Su

    . Pramod ri S.Jayara ri V.S.Verm ri M.Deena

    duled inte wn sched nment of wer, Gove

    RDER

    ort of No n amou

    the Depa ars of UI .2011 had er, Gove

    otu)

    Y COMM

    o-motu) Deo, Chai man, Me a, Memb Dayalan

    DATE O

    rchanges ule by De Mizoram, A rnment o rthern-Eas nt of ` 1 rtment of drawl as directed rnment o

    ISSION

    rperson mber

    er

    , Member

    F ORDER: 1

    (UI) char partment izwal

    f Mizoram,

    …Re

    tern Reg

    0.47 crore Power, G on 31.5. the first f Mizoram

    Page

    9.10.2011

    ges for th of Powe Aizwal

    spondents

    ional Loa includin overnmen 2011. Th responden (secon

    1

    e r, d

    g

    t

    e

    t

    d

    1

    respond Electric initiated Electric related In respo notice n

    2. Th behalf directed current to perso reasons directio

    3. D

    behalf o Mizoram was c

    4. W

    underst utility dr

    t/Oct/Ord

    ent) to s ity Act, 2 against ity Regula matters) R nse, the or had en e matter of the resp the firs UI charg nally app for non- ns contain uring the f the resp , who wa onspicuou e note w ood the

    awing po

    er in Petitio

    how caus 003 (here them f

    tory Com egulation responde tered app was listed ondents. t respond es by 10 ear befo complian ed in

    hearing o ondents. s directed s by his ab ith conce UI mech

    wer from t

    n No. 158/2

    e as to inafter re or non-co mission (U s, 2009 (h nts had n earance for hear The Com ent to liqu

    .10.2011.

    re the C ce with our orde f the ma Secreta to pe

    sence.

    rn that so anism in it he grid ov

    011 (Suo m

    why actio ferred to mpliance nschedul ereinafter either fil n person o ing on 2 mission in idate the Second

    ommission the provi r dated 12 tter on 1 ry, Depart rsonally a me of th s correct er and ab

    otu)

    n under as 'the A of the pro ed Interc referred t ed any rep r through

    6.7.2011.

    its order d outstand responde on 18.10 sions of

    .7.2011.

    8.10.2011,

    ment of Po ppear be e constitu prospect ove its sc Section ct') shal visions of hange ch o as 'UI re ly to the s advocate None app ated 27. ing UI inc nt was als .2011 to e UI regula none ap

    wer, Gov fore the C ent State ive. Any hedule is

    Page

    142 of th l be no the Centra arges an gulations' how caus

    .

    eared o 9.2011 ha luding th o directe xplain th tions an peared o ernment o ommissio s have no constituen getting th

    2

    e t l d

    ).

    e

    n

    d

    e

    d

    e

    d

    n

    f

    n

    t

    t

    2

    power a to mak belongs drawn constitu operati therefo Accord under S the dat

    5. Th

    18.10.20

    non-ap the Ac non-co a pena persona

    (M.DEEN

    MEMBE

    t/Oct/Ord

    t the cos e promp to othe under UI ents of th on of

    re, clearly ingly, we ection 142 e of issue o e second

    11 as dire pearance

    t has be

    mpliance

    lty of `

    lly liable Sd/-

    A DAYALA

    R

    er in Petitio

    t of other t paymen r constitue , the first eir legitim the com

    violated th impose

    of the

    f this orde respond

    cted nor

    . Therefore en mad

    with the one lakh to pay fo

    N) (V

    M

    n No. 158/2

    constituen t for con nts. By no respond ate UI due mercial e provisio a penalty Act which r.

    ent did n had he file , a clea e out

    order of th on the s r non-com sd/-

    .S.VERMA)

    EMBER

    011 (Suo m

    ts. Conse suming t t making p ent has s, but ha mechanis ns of Regu of ` one shall be ot appea d any af r cut case against e Commis econd re pliance o s

    (S.JAYA

    MEM

    otu)

    quently, he powe rompt pa not only s created m. The

    lation 10 lakh on deposite r before fidavit listin of violati the seco

    sion. Acc

    spondent

    f the orde d/-

    RAMAN)

    BER

    it is unde r which l yment for deprived impedime responden of the UI the first d within 15 the Com

    g the rea on of Sect nd respo ordingly, which h

    r of the Co sd/-

    (Dr. PRAM

    CHAIRPE

    Page

    r obligatio egitimate the powe the othe nts in th ts hav

    regulation responden days from mission o sons for h ion 142 o ndent fo we impos e will b mmission.

    OD DEO)

    RSON

    3

    n ly r

    r

    e

    e

    s. t

    n

    is f

    r

    e

    3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    1. Department of Power, Government of Mizoram, Aiz...
    (Oct 19, 2011)