Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    STATE OF GUJARAT v. VALA RAHUL KANJIBHAI

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2106 of 2020 In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 12857 of 2020 With

    R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1767 of 2020 With

    R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1996 of 2020 With

    R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2012 of 2020 With

    R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2387 of 2020 ==========================================================

    STATE OF GUJARAT

    Versus

    VALA RAHUL KANJIBHAI

    ========================================================== Appearance:

    MR DHARMESH DEVNANI, AGP(1) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2 MR. EKRAMA H QURESHI(7000) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4 ==========================================================

    CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH

    and

    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

    Date : 26/10/2020

    COMMON ORAL ORDER

    (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)

    1 We have heard Shri Dharmesh Devnani, learned A.G.P. for the State appellant, Shri Ekrama Qureshi, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents in all the above four Civil Applications namely Civil Applications Nos.2106 of 2020, 1996 of 2020, 2012 of 2010 and 2387 of 2020 and Shri Nikul Soni, learned counsel for the respondent in Civil Application No.1767 of 2020.

    2 Except for Civil Application No.2387 of 2020, in four other matters, learned counsel for the respondents have filed their objections / counter affidavits in delay condonation matters.

    Page 1 of 2

    However, while making their submissions, Shri Qureshi and Shri Soni, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that they are not seriously objecting to the condonation of delay.

    3 Having perused the explanation tendered by the State for condonation of delay in filing the appeals, we find that the same has been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly, in view of the above, we condone the delay in filing the appeals and allow all the five Civil Applications.

    4 Office to register the appeals in regular side and list them again for admission in the week commencing from 23rd November 2020.

    (VIKRAM NATH, CJ)

    (J. B. PARDIWALA, J)

    DIPTI PATEL / CHANDRESH

    Page 2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    STATE OF GUJARAT v. VALA RAHUL KANJIBHAI
    (Oct 26, 2020)