Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Case Number

ITA 1090/BANG/2022

Disposition

in part

Attorney(S)

Acts

SECTION 2 MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988
SECTION 119 INCOME TAX ACT 1961
SECTION 139 A INCOME TAX ACT 1961
provisions of clause (38) of section 10 or section 10A or section 10B or section 10BA or section 54 or section 54B or section 54D or section 54EC or section 54F or section 54G or section 54GA or section 54GB
Societies Act, 1959
provisions of the Karnataka State Cooperative Society's Act 1959
Act g Income-tax Rules,
u/s. 80(P)(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act)
2(ii) of the section and Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959
Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959
Section 63 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 CHAPTER VIII AUDIT, INQUIRY, INSPECTION AND SURCHARGE. 63

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Summary of Decision: ITA No. 1090/Bang/2022 (Assessment Year 2018-19)

Factual and Procedural Background

The appellant is M/s. CSI Credit Co-Operative Society (a credit co-operative society registered under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959), assessed to income tax by the Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru for AY 2018-19. The society filed its return of income on 31.10.2018 declaring gross total income of Rs. 6,39,649, claiming deduction under section 80P(2) of Rs. 5,46,661, and disclosed total income of Rs. 92,990. The Assessing Officer, by intimation under section 143(1), denied deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) on the ground that the return was filed after the due date in section 139(1) and therefore the assessee was not eligible for the deduction.

The assessee appealed to the CIT(A), who confirmed the AO's disallowance, observing that after the 2018 amendment and reading section 80AC (now described in the order) into the relevant Chapter VIA provisions, deductions covered by that heading (including section 80P) would be available only if the return was filed on or before the due date under section 139(1) for AY 2018-19 and onwards. The assessee has appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru (SMC "C" Bench).

Legal Issues Presented

Whether the assessee-credit co-operative society, having its accounts required to be audited under Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, is entitled to treat the "due date" for filing the return for AY 2018-19 as extended to 31.10.2018 under Explanation 2(ii) to section 139(1) read with the CBDT orders dated 24.09.2018 and 08.10.2018;
Whether filing the return on 31.10.2018 (as per the CBDT extension) enables the assessee to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) for AY 2018-19 notwithstanding the Assessing Officer's denial for late filing; and
Whether the coordinate bench and other Tribunal decisions upholding denial of section 80P deductions because of late filing are applicable to the present case where the return was filed on 31.10.2018 and the assessee's accounts are said to be statutorily required to be audited under the Co-operative Societies Act.

Arguments of the Parties

Appellant's (Assessee's) Arguments (via learned A.R.)

The assessee filed its return on 31.10.2018, which, the learned A.R. contended, falls within the extended due date made available by the CBDT's notification/orders dated 24.09.2018 and 08.10.2018 that ultimately extended relevant filing deadlines up to 31.10.2018 for assessees covered by clause (a) of Explanation 2 to section 139(1).
The assessee submitted it is liable to audit under Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959. Under Explanation 2(ii) to section 139(1), where accounts are required to be audited under the Income Tax Act or any other law for the time being in force, the due date is 31st October of the assessment year; therefore, the extended CBDT order works in the assessee's favour and the return filed on 31.10.2018 is within time for this category.
Consequently, the assessee argued it should be granted the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the return was filed within the extended due date applicable to entities whose accounts are required to be audited under any law (here, the Co-operative Societies Act).

Revenue's Arguments (via learned D.R.)

The learned D.R. argued that Explanation 2(ii) to section 139(1) is not applicable to the assessee because the assessee is not liable to audit under section 44AB of the Income-tax Act (i.e., audit under the Income-tax Act), and therefore the extended time limit is not available to the assessee.
Relying on the restriction introduced by section 80-AC (as discussed in the CIT(A)'s order), the learned D.R. maintained that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) cannot be allowed where the return is filed beyond the due date prescribed by section 139(1) (as interpreted after the 2018 amendment and related guidance).
The learned D.R. also relied on recent coordinate-bench Tribunal decisions (cited in the order) upholding denial of the deduction where return filing was beyond the due date; he submitted these decisions supported the Revenue's case.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent	Rule or Principle Cited For	Application by the Court
Syndicate Bank Staff Co-operative Society Ltd., ITA No. 1062/Bang/2022 (dated 03.01.2023)	Upheld denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) where the return was filed beyond the due date for AY 2018-19.	The bench observed this decision but distinguished it: in Syndicate Bank Staff Co-op Society the return was filed on 30.12.2018 (i.e., well beyond 31.10.2018), so that precedent was held inapplicable to the present case where the return was filed on 31.10.2018.
Janki Vaishali Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., ITA No. 944/Mum/2022 (dated 31.10.2022)	Tribunal (Mumbai Bench) upheld denial under section 80P(2)(i)(d) because the return was filed on 24.12.2018 — beyond the due date under section 139(1) for AY 2018-19.	The Court noted this decision but found it distinguishable because the assessee in that case filed the return on 24.12.2018, whereas the present assessee filed on 31.10.2018 which falls within the CBDT-extended date applicable to those whose accounts require audit under another law.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Tribunal's analysis proceeds in these principal steps, following the material in the opinion:

Identification of statutory provisions and administrative orders:
- The court examined section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act (including Explanation 2 defining "due date" for various categories) and the CBDT orders dated 24.09.2018 and 08.10.2018 (which ultimately extended certain filing deadlines for AY 2018-19 first to 15.10.2018 and then to 31.10.2018 for assessees covered by clause (a) of Explanation 2 to section 139(1)).
- The court also reproduced Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, which requires every co-operative society to get its accounts audited at least once a year before the first of September following the close of the cooperative year.
Application of Explanation 2(ii) to the facts:
- Explanation 2(ii) to section 139(1) provides that where an assessee's accounts are required to be audited under the Income-tax Act or any other law for the time being in force, the "due date" for filing the return is the 31st day of October of the assessment year.
- Because Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act requires audit of co-operative societies' accounts, the Tribunal concluded that a co-operative society whose accounts are thus required to be audited falls within Explanation 2(ii) ("accounts are required to be audited under ... any other law for the time being in force").
Effect of CBDT extension orders:
- The CBDT orders (24.09.2018 and 08.10.2018) extended the due dates for certain assessees covered by clause (a) of Explanation 2 to section 139(1) ultimately up to 31.10.2018. The Tribunal read these orders together with Explanation 2(ii).
- Since the assessee filed its return on 31.10.2018, the Tribunal held that the return was filed within the extended time made available by the CBDT for those assessees whose accounts require audit under another law (which, per the assessee, includes Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act).
Evaluation of parties' contentions and reliance on precedents:
- The Tribunal considered the Revenue's reliance on coordinate-bench decisions that upheld denial of section 80P deductions for late-filed returns, but distinguished them on facts — specifically noting that in the cited cases returns had been filed well after 31.10.2018 (for example 24.12.2018 or 30.12.2018), and thus those precedents did not apply to the present factual matrix where the return was filed on 31.10.2018.
Conditional direction to Assessing Officer:
- The Tribunal held that the assessee cannot be denied the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) if it filed the return on or before 31.10.2018 and the return disclosed (in ITR-5) that the assessee is liable to audit under the Co-operative Societies Act and mentioned the date of audit report. On that basis, the Tribunal remitted the matter to the AO for fresh consideration: the AO was directed to grant the section 80P deduction if the assessee establishes those disclosures in the return filed on 31.10.2018.

Holding and Implications

Holding: The appeal is partly allowed (for statistical purposes). The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) if the assessee establishes that it (a) filed its return on 31.10.2018 and (b) disclosed in the ITR-5 that it is liable to audit under the Co-operative Societies Act and mentioned the date of furnishing the audit report. The matter is remitted to the file of the AO for fresh consideration in light of these observations.

Implications:

Direct effect on the parties: the issue is sent back to the Assessing Officer for verification and, if the assessee's return indeed contains the required disclosure regarding audit liability and the audit report date, the AO must allow the section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction for AY 2018-19. If the assessee cannot establish those disclosures, the AO will proceed accordingly.
No broad new legal principle or binding precedent was declared by the Tribunal beyond the application of existing statutory provisions and the CBDT orders to the facts. The Tribunal distinguished prior Tribunal decisions on their facts rather than overruling them; thus, the decision does not purport to lay down a new general rule beyond the application to the present facts.

Dictated and pronounced in open Court on 16th January 2023 by Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member (ITAT Bengaluru, SMC "C" Bench).

Show full summary ...

CSI Credit Co-Operative Society, Tumkur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 & TPS, Tumkur

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

BENGALURU (SMC) "C" BENCH, BENGALURU Before Shri Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member

ITA No. 1090/Bang/2022 (Assessment Year: 2018-19)
M/s. CSI Credit Co-Operative Society CSIVC Campus, CSIVC B.H. Road, Tumkur Karnataka 572102 PAN – AABAC9629F	vs	The Income Tax Officer Ward 1 and TPS Tumkur
(Appellant)		(Respondent)
Assessee by:	Shri R.E. Balasubramaniyan, CA
Revenue by:	Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Date of hearing:	16.01.2023
Date of pronouncement:	16.01.2023

O R D E R

Per: Chandra Poojari, A.M.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the learned CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 14.10.2022 for AY 2018-19.

2. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal: -

"2. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous and bad in law inasmuch as

a. Ld CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the assessee society, being registered under The Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 is a body corporate within the meaning of section 9 of the said Act and is also liable to get its books audited by an auditor u/s 63 of the said Act.

b. He failed to appreciate that the due date for the filing of the annual return of income u/s 139(1) for the appellant was September 30^th, 2019 which was extended to October 31^st, 2019, vide the order F.No. 225/157/2019-ITA.II dated 27/09/2019 and the appellant had field its return within the due dates making it eligible for deduction u/s 80P."

3. The facts of the case are that the assessee is a co-operative society and is assessed to Income Tax by Centralized Processing Centre, Bangalore. The assessee is a Credit Cooperative Society registered under the provisions of the Karnataka State Cooperative Society's Act 1959 and is engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members, as per the bylaws approved by the Registrar of Cooperative societies. The assessee filed a return of Income on 31.10.2018 with gross total income of Rs.639649/- and claiming deduction u/.80 P(2) of the Act of Rs.546661/- and disclosed total income of Rs.92990/-. The assessee received intimation u/s. 143(1) of the IT Act through mail. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the deduction u/s. 80(P)(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by observing that the credit co-operative society is eligible for availing the exemption under Section 80P(20(a)(i) of the Act only if the return of income is filed with the due date. In the present case the assessee filed the return of income after due date for filing he return.

4. On appeal the learned CIT(A) observed as under: -

"The Appellant has claimed deduction u/s. 80P (2)(a)(i) of the Act, in respect of income from co-operative society engaged in carrying business of banking by providing credit facilities to its members. The Appellant has filed its Return of income on 31.10.2018, whereas the due date for filing original Return was 31.08.2018. The AO denied the exemption claimed u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, due to late filing of Return of Income.

The Appellant has submitted that the Appellant presumed that its case is covered under tax audit cases, hence, the delay in filing Return of income.

In the 2018 Budget amendment, to have one principle in respect of certain incomes, it was proposed that the scope of Sec. 80AC shall be extended to all similar deductions which are covered in heading

"C — Deduction in respect of certain incomes" in Chapter VIA. After this amendment, deduction will be available only if return is filed on or before the due date. Deduction u/s. 80P is also covered under the heading "C — Deduction in respect of certain incomes"

Thus, in respect of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act, the same is not allowable, if the Income Tax Return is not filed within the time permitted u/s. 139(1) of the Act, for A.Y. 2018-19 and onwards. Accordingly, the order of the AO u/s. 143(1) of the Act, disallowing deduction u/s. 80P of the Act is confirmed and the ground of appeal of the Appellant is dismissed."

Against this order the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal bay way of the above grounds.

5. The learned A.R. submitted that the AO denied the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act on the reason that the assessee filed the return of income not within the due date mentioned in Section 139(1) of the Act r.w.s. 80AC of the Act. Accordingly the learned A.R. the assessee filed the return of income on 31.10.2018. As per the notification issued by the CBDT on 8^thOctober, 2018 the assessee can file the return of income before the extended time limit upto 31.10.2018 and as such the assessee should be granted deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Further he drew our attention that the assessee is liable to audit under Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 and as per Explanation 2(ii) to Section 139(1) of the Act the extended time limit to file the return of income is 31.10.2018. Hence, the denial of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act is not justified and it is to be granted to the assessee.

6. On the other hand, the learned D.R. submitted that Explanation 2(ii) in Section 139(1) of the Act is not applicable to the assessee, since the assessee is not liable to audit under Section 44AB of the Act. Being so, extended time limit to file the return of income is not available to the assessee and in view of the restriction imposed in Section 80-AC of the Act the assessee is not entitled for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.

7. I have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. In this case the assessment year involved is 2018-19. The regular time limit to

file the return of income for the assessee is 31.08.2018. However, the said limit has been extended by CBDT vide circular dated 08.10.2018, which reads as follows: -

"SECTION 139, READ WITH SECTION 119, OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 INCOME - RETURN OF - EXTENSION OF DUE DATE FOR FILING OF INCOME-TAX RETURNS AS WELL AS REPORTS OF AUDIT

ORDER IEN0.225/358/2018/ITA.11]. DATED 24-9-2018

On due consideration of representations from various stakeholders for extending the due date, being 30th September, 2018, for filing of income- tax returns and various reports of audit pertaining to assessment-year 2018-19 for assessees covered under clause (a) of Explanation 2 to section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) read with relevant pThvisions of the Act g Income-tax Rules, the CBDT, hereby extends the due date for filing of income-tax returns as well as all reports of audit (which were required to be filed by the said specified date), from 30th September, 2018 to 15th October, 2018. However, there shall be no extension of the due date for purpose of Explanation 1 to section 234A (Interest for defaults in furnishing return) of the Act and the assessee shall remain liable for payment of interest as per provisions of section 234A of the Act.

F.No. 225/358/2018/17AM

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Direct Taxes

North-Block, ITA.II Division

New Delhi, the 8^thof October, 2018

Order under Section 119 of the income -tax Act,1961 On consideration of representations from various stakeholders for further extension of due date being 3V¹September, 2018 for purpose of filing return of income as well as various reports of audit pertaining to Assessment Year 2018-2019 for assessees covered under clause (a) of Explanation 2 of section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act), the Board, in partial modification of its order dated 24.09.2018 in file of even number, hereby, further extends the due date for filing of return of income and reports of audit pertaining to Assessment Year 2018-2019 from 15th October, 2018 to 31st October, 2018. However, as specified in earlier order dated 21.09,2018, assessees filing their return of income within the extended due date shall he liable for levy of interest as per provisions of section 234A of the Act.

(Rajarajeswar R.)

Under Secretary to Government of India

Copy to:-

1. PS to f M /MO to ;M/PS to MoS(R)/OSD to MoSi(R)

2. PPS to Secretary (Revenue)

3. Chairman (CBDT), All Members, Cenha! Board of Direct Taxes

4 Ali Pr.CCsIT/CCsIT/Pr DsGIT/DsGIT

5. Ali Joint Secretaries/CsIT, CBDT

6 Directors/Deputy Secretaries/Under Secretaries of Central Board of Direct Taxes

7 ADG(Systems)-4 with request to place the order on official website

8. Addl.CIT, Date base Cell for placing the order on officers website

9 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, IP Estate, New Dell, 110004

1 0. CIT (M&TP) with request to issue Press Release & for placing on Twitter handle of the department (Rajarajeswar R.) Under Secretary to Government of India 8. Section 139(1) of the Act is also relevant to decide the issue in dispute, which reads as under: - "139. (1) Every person,— (a) being a company or a firm; or

(b) being a person other than a company or a firm, if his total income or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax,

shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year, in the prescribed²⁰ form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed :

Provided that a person referred to in clause (b), who is not required to furnish a return under this sub-section and residing in such area as may be specified by the Board in this behalf by notification in the Official Gazette, and who during the previous year incurs an expenditure of fifty thousand rupees or more towards consumption of electricity or at any time during the previous year fulfils any one of the following conditions, namely :—

(i) is in occupation of an immovable property exceeding a specified floor area, whether by way of ownership, tenancy or otherwise, as may be specified by the Board in this behalf; or

(ii) is the owner or the lessee of a motor vehicle other than a two-wheeled motor vehicle, whether having any detachable side car having extra wheel attached to such two-wheeled motor vehicle or not; or

(iii) [***]

(iv) has incurred expenditure for himself or any other person on travel to any foreign country; or

(v) is the holder of a credit card, not being an "add-on" card, issued by any bank or institution; or

(vi) is a member of a club where entrance fee charged is twenty-five thousand rupees or more,

shall furnish a return, of his income during any previous year ending before the 1st day of April, 2005, on or before the due date in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed :

Provided further that the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify the class or classes of persons to whom the provisions of the first proviso shall not apply :

Provided also that every company or a firm shall furnish on or before the due date the return in respect of its income or loss in every previous year :

Provided also that a person, being a resident other than not ordinarily resident in India within the meaning of clause (6) of section 6, who is not required to furnish a return under this sub-section and who at any time during the previous year,—

(a) holds, as a beneficial owner or otherwise, any asset (including any financial interest in any entity) located outside India or has signing authority in any account located outside India; or

(b) is a beneficiary of any asset (including any financial interest in any entity) located outside India,

shall furnish, on or before the due date, a return in respect of his income or loss for the previous year in such form and verified in such manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed:

Provided also that nothing contained in the fourth proviso shall apply to an individual, being a beneficiary of any asset (including any financial interest in any entity) located outside India where, income, if any, arising from such asset is includible in the income of the person referred to in clause (a) of that proviso in accordance with the provisions of this Act:

Provided also that every person, being an individual or a Hindu undivided family or an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, or an artificial juridical person, if his total income or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act during the previous year, without giving effect to the provisions of clause (38) of section 10 or section 10A or section 10B or section 10BA or section 54 or section 54B or section 54D or section 54EC or section 54F or section 54G or section 54GA or section 54GB or Chapter VI-A exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year, in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed:

Provided also that a person referred to in clause (b), who is not required to furnish a return under this sub-section, and who during the previous year—

(i) has deposited an amount or aggregate of the amounts exceeding one crore rupees in one or more current accounts maintained with a banking company or a co-operative bank; or

(ii) has incurred expenditure of an amount or aggregate of the amounts exceeding two lakh rupees for himself or any other person for travel to a foreign country; or

(iii) has incurred expenditure of an amount or aggregate of the amounts exceeding one lakh rupees towards consumption of electricity; or

(iv) fulfils such other conditions as may be prescribed, shall furnish a return of his income on or before the due date in such form and verified in such manner and setting forth such other particulars, as may be prescribed.

Explanation 1.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "motor vehicle" shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (28) of section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988).

Explanation 2.—In this sub-section, "due date" means,—

(a) where the assessee other than an assessee referred to in clause (aa) is—

(i) a company; or

(ii) a person (other than a company) whose accounts are required to be audited under this Act or under any other law for the time being in force; or

(iii) a ²¹[***] partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited under this Act or under any other law for the time being in force ²²[or the

spouse of such partner if the provisions of section 5A applies to such spouse],

the ²³[31st day of October] of the assessment year;

(aa) in the case of an assessee ²⁴[, including the partners of the firm or the spouse of such partner (if the provisions of section 5A applies to such spouse), being such assessee,] who is required to furnish a report referred to in section 92E, the 30th day of November of the assessment year;

(b) in the case of a person other than a company, referred to in the first proviso to this sub-section, the 31st day of October of the assessment year;

(c) in the case of any other assessee, the 31st day of July of the assessment year."

As seen from Explanation 2(ii) if the assessee's books of account requires to be audited under the Income Tax or any other law for the time being in force, the time limit would be extended up to 31^stOctober of that assessment year. In the present case, the learned A.R. submitted that as per Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 the assessee's books are required to be audited under the Act.

8.1 For clarity the same is reproduced as under: -

"Extract of Section 63 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959

CHAPTER VIII

AUDIT, INQUIRY, INSPECTION AND SURCHARGE.

63 Audit. - (1) Every Cooperative society shall get its accounts audited at least once in a year before the first of September following the close of the cooperative year by an auditor or an auditing firm appointed by the general body of the cooperative society from a panel of auditors or auditing firms approved by the Director of cooperative audit;

Provided that the Director of co-operative audit shall be the authority competent to prepare and maintain a list of auditors and auditing firms who satisfy the prescribed qualification and experience for undertaking the audit of accounts of co-operative societies in the state.

[Provided further that, the National Bank shall prepare a list of auditors and auditing firms who satisfy, the prescribed qualification and experience for undertaking the audit of accounts of State Co-operative Bank and District Central Co-operative Banks.]"

9. A conjoint reading of Section 139(1) of the Act read with the Explanation 2(ii) of the section and Section 63 of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 makes it clear that the assessee's books are required to be audited under the Co-Operative Societies Act, the extended time is available to the assessee upto 31.10.2018 to the file the return of income for the AY 2018-

19. Admittedly in the present case the assessee filed the return of income on 31.10.2018. The assessee cannot be denied deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act if the assessee filed the return of income on or before 31.10.2018 and the same has been disclosed in the return of income as required in ITR-5 stating that assessee is liable to audit under Cooperative Society Act and mentioned the date of audit in the return of income filed by the assessee. If it is so, the assessee could avail the benefit of circular issued by CBDT cited supra and the assessee has to be granted with the deduction under Section 80P(2)((i)(a) of the Act.

10. Further the learned D.R. strongly placed reliance on the order of the coordinate bench in the case of Syndicate Bank Staff Co-operative Society Ltd. in ITA No. 1062/Bang/2022 dated 03.01.2023 wherein the Tribunal upheld the denial of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Since the assessee has filed the return of income only on 30.12.2018 for AY 2018-19 this case law cannot be applied to the facts of the present case. Further the learned D.R. relied on the order of the Tribunal's Mumbai Bench in the case of Janki Vaishali Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. in ITA No. 944/Mum/2022 dated 31.10.2022 wherein the Tribunal upheld the denial under Section 80P(2)(i)(d) of the Act on the reason that the assessee has filed return of

income on 24.12.2018 which is beyond the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1) of the Act. As discussed earlier in the present case assessee has filed return of income on 31.10.2018, which is within the extended time limit in the case of the present assessee whose books are to required to be audited under the relevant Co-operative Societies Act and

Explanation 2(ii) of Section 139(1) of the Act is applicable to the assessee's case.

11. Being so, I find no force in the argument of the learned D.R. Accordingly, I direct the AO to grant deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80P(2)(i)(a) of the Act if the assessee establish that it has disclosed the fact that assessee is liable to audit under Cooperatives Societies Act and mentioned the date of furnishing audit report in the return of income filed by the assessee on 31.10.2018 for the impugned AY 2018-19. Accordingly the issue in dispute is remitted to the file of AO for fresh consideration in the light of above observations.

12. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Dictated and pronounced in the open Court on 16^thJanuary, 2023. Sd/-

(Chandra Poojari) Accountant Member

Bengaluru, Dated: 16^thJanuary, 2023 Copy to:

1. The Appellant

2. The Respondent

3. The CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi

4. The CIT -

5. The DR, ITAT, Bengaluru

6. Guard File By Order //True Copy// Assistant Registrar ITAT, Bengaluru n.p.

CSI Credit Co-Operative Society, Tumkur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 & TPS, Tumkur

Summary of Decision: ITA No. 1090/Bang/2022 (Assessment Year 2018-19)

Factual and Procedural Background

Legal Issues Presented

Arguments of the Parties

Appellant's (Assessee's) Arguments (via learned A.R.)

Revenue's Arguments (via learned D.R.)

Table of Precedents Cited

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

Holding and Implications

CSI Credit Co-Operative Society, Tumkur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 & TPS, Tumkur

Comments