Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2023 KER 13019
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2023 KER 13019
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    MANOJ KABEER v. SUB REGISTRAR

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

    FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1944

    WP(C) NO. 2356 OF 2023

    PETITIONERS:

    1 MANOJ KABEER,

    AGED 54 YEARS,

    S/O MOHAMMED KUNJU.M.P., 5C,

    BCG MIDTOWN, PANAMPILLY NAGAR.P.O.,

    ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 036.

    2 SELVI L.,

    AGED 40 YEARS,

    D/O A.LAKSHMANAN, GOKULAM-2, PUZHAVATHU, CHANGANASSERYP.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 101.

    BY ADVS.

    A.RAJASIMHAN

    VYKHARI.K.U

    SHARAFUDHEEN M.K.

    RESPONDENT:

    SUB REGISTRAR,

    SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, M.G.ROAD.P.O,

    ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 016.

    SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

    03.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

    1

    : 2 :

    SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

    ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No2356 of 2023

    -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2023

    JUDGMENT

    This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

    "(i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing Ext.P10;

    (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to solemnize and register the marriage of the petitioners as applied in Ext.P7."

    2. However, today when the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

    I make it clear that all the questions of facts and law raised in the writ petition are left open.

    Sd/-

    SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE

    ak

    : 3 :

    APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2356/2023 PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:-

    ExhibitP1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST TALAQ LETTER

    DATED 11-4-2022. ExhibitP2 TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST TALAQ LETTER

    DATED 12-5-2022. ExhibitP3 TRUE COPY OF THE THIRD TALAQ LETTER

    DATED 13-6-2022. ExhibitP4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 1-8-2022

    ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, THEKKANARYAD

    JUMA-ATH MAHAL MUNAVVIRUL ISLAM SANGAM

    TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

    ExhibitP5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22-8-2022

    ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, PULIMOOD JUMA

    MASJID MAHALLU TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

    ExhibitP6 TRUE COPY OF THE THE JUDGMENT OF THE

    FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR IN

    OP NO. 313/2013 ON 11-10-2013. ExhibitP7 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 5-12-

    2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER

    SECTION 5 OF TEH SPECIAL MARRIAGES ACT,

    1954.

    ExhibitP8 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CUM RECEIPT DATED 6-12-2022 ISSUED BY THE

    REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT.

    ExhibitP9 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF INTENDED MARRIAGE OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 6-12-

    2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

    ExhibitP10 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. SM 258/2023

    DATED 18-1-2023 ISSUED BY THE

    RESPONDENT.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MANOJ KABEER v. SUB REGISTRAR
    (Mar 3, 2023)