Loading..
Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Section 2(f) of RTI Act.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Section 2(f) of RTI Act.

    MOHD OSMAN v. Indian Army

    केीय सचू ना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गगं नाथ माग, मिु नरका Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई दली, New Delhi - 110067 File No : CIC/IARMY/A/2017/172493/SD Mohd Osman ….अपीलकता/Appellant

    VERSUS

    बनाम

    CPIO,

    Army Medical Corps Record Office, Lucknow-226002 … ितवादीगण /Respondents

    RTI application filed on : 20/05/2017
    CPIO replied on : 19/06/2017
    First appeal filed on : 12/07/2017
    First Appellate Authority order : 29/08/2017
    Second Appeal dated : 10/10/2017
    Date of Hearing : 24/10/2018
    Date of Decision : 24/10/2018

    Information sought:

    The Appellant sought information regarding revised PE of AMC Records QE Mar

    2017; whether rank of Lt (ARO) can be filled by CGO (ARO) etc.

    Grounds for the Second Appeal:

    The CPIO has not provided the desired information.

    Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:

    The following were present:-

    Appellant: Present and assisted by Alok Kumar Singh, Advocate and Rajendra

    Prasad Singh, Advocate through VC.

    1

    Respondent: Lt Col. Jasvinder Singh, OIC (Pen Gp.) & PIO, Army Medical Corps Record Office, Lucknow present through VC.

    Appellant stated that he is dissatisfied with the denial of information on para 1 and on para (3) no reply has been provided by the CPIO.

    CPIO submitted that information sought on para 1 pertains to Peace Establishment strength record of AMC which consists of sensitive information deemed as confidential by the probable holder of information. Commission remarked that no exemption clause of RTI Act has been invoked by the CPIO for the denial of information, merely citing the information as being confidential holds no ground under RTI Act. Moreover, Appellant has merely sought to know the authorized, held and surplus strength of four designations; Commission finds no reason to deny this information under any of the exemption clauses of RTI Act.

    CPIO later agreed to abide by the order of the Commission. Decision

    Commission directs the CPIO to provide available information on para 1 of the RTI Application to the Appellant free of cost. Further, on paras 2 & 3 of the RTI Application, no relief is being ordered as information sought is in the form of seeking clarification and interpretation of the CPIO which is outside the purview of Section 2(f) of RTI Act.

    The above direction should be complied within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order and a compliance report to this effect be duly sent to the Commission by the CPIO.

    The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

    Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िसहा )

    Information Commissioner ( सचू ना आयु )

    2

    File No : CIC/IARMY/A/2017/172493/SD Authenticated true copy

    (अभमाणत सयापत त)

    Haro Prasad Sen

    Dy. Registrar

    011-26106140 / haro.sen@nic.in हरो साद सेन, उप-पजं ीयक

    दनाकं / Date

    3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MOHD OSMAN v. Indian Army
    (Oct 24, 2018)