Loading..
Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)

    ANITA v. Indian Army

    केीय सचू ना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गंगनाथ माग, मुिनरका Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई दली, New Delhi - 110067 File No : CIC/IARMY/A/2018/147975 Anita ….अपीलकता/Appellant

    VERSUS

    बनाम

    CPIO,

    Sena Chikitsa Corps Abhilekh Karyalaya, Army Medical Corps Record Office, Lucknow - 226002. … ितवादीगण /Respondent

    RTI application filed on : 19/08/2017
    CPIO replied on : 13/09/2017
    First appeal filed on : 21/09/2017
    First Appellate Authority order : 17/10/2017
    Second Appeal dated : 26/07/2018
    Date of Hearing : 13/02/2020
    Date of Decision : 13/02/2020

    lwpuk vk;qDr : fnO; izdk"k flUgk

    INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : DIVYA PRAKASH SINHA

    Information sought:

    The Appellant sought details of action taken on the letters dated 18.07.2017 and 19.07.2017 and specifically requested to provide the information in Hindi language.

    Grounds for the Second Appeal:

    The CPIO has not provided the desired information.

    Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:

    The following were present:-

    1

    Appellant: Represented by Ram Kumar through VC. Respondent: Lt Col Vinod Kumar, SRO & CPIO, Army Medical Corps Record Office, Lucknow present through VC.

    Rep of the Appellant stated that he is not satisfied with the information provided by the CPIO. He further stated that he wrote two letters dated 19.08.2017 and 21.09.2017 in order to request provision of certain documents pertaining to their father for claiming his pension.

    Upon instance of the Commission, Appellant stated that he has sent both the letters by the Speed post.

    CPIO submitted that information sought vide applications dated 19.08.2017 and 21.09.2017 was not available on record and the Appellant informed accordingly vide letter dated 13.09.2017.

    Commission remarked to counsel the CPIO that action taken on averred letter also includes processing of said letters in their office and Note Sheet/Correspondence prepared subsequently, but CPIO has not considered the same while replying to the Instant RTI Application. He is counseled to be careful in future so that lapses do not recur.

    Decision

    Commission has gone through the case records and on the basis of the proceeding during hearing directs the CPIO to provide to the Appellant relevant note sheet/correspondence with respect to the processing of the letters dated 19.08.2017 and 21.09.2017 available at their office, free of cost within 15 days of receipt of this order and send a compliance report of the same to the Commission.

    The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

    Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िसहा )

    Information Commissioner ( सचू ना आयु )

    2

    File No : CIC/IARMY/A/2018/147975 Authenticated true copy (अिभमाणत सयापत ित) Haro Prasad Sen

    Dy. Registrar

    011-26106140 / haro.sen@nic.in हरो साद सेन, उप-पंजीयक दनाकं / Date

    3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    ANITA v. Indian Army
    (Feb 13, 2020)