Loading..
Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)

    AJAY KUMAR CHAKRESH v. Air India

    केीय सचू ना आयोग Central Information Commission बाबा गगं नाथ माग, मुिनरका Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई दली, New Delhi - 110067 File No: CIC/AIRIN/C/2017/161912/SD Ajay Kumar Chakresh …. िशकायतकता /Complainant

    VERSUS

    बनाम

    CPIO,

    Air India Express Limited, Air India Building, 21th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. … ितवादीगण /Respondent

    RTI application filed on : 06/07/2017
    CPIO replied on : No reply
    First appeal filed on : N.A.
    First Appellate Authority order : N.A.
    Complaint dated : 31/08/2017
    Date of Hearing : 07/05/2019
    Date of Decision : 07/05/2019

    Information sought:

    The Complainant sought information regarding action taken by Chief Executive

    Officer on his letter dated 20.06.2017 in connection with Advertisement

    published in the month of October, 2017 pertaining to Cabin Crew

    Recruitment, Air India Charters Ltd; date on which Vaishali Sing provisionally

    qualified for pre employment medical examination; date of joining of selected

    candidates after PEME below serial no.72; number of candidates who joined

    and posted on the post of Cabin Crew out of the provisionally qualified

    candidates.

    Grounds for the Complaint:

    The CPIO has not provided the desired information.

    Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:

    The following were present:-

    Complainant: Not present.

    1

    Respondent: Ms Aditi Khandekar, Company Secretary & CPIO, Air India Express Ltd., Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai present through VC. CPIO submitted that after receiving the RTI Application, information was collected from different sections and appropriate reply was provided to the Complainant on 24.08.2017. She further submitted that in 2018, the name of Air India Charters Limited has been changed to Air India Express Limited. Decision

    Complainant has not availed the opportunity to appear before the Commission to plead his case/contest CPIO's submission. Commission upholds the submission of the CPIO. No further action lies.

    The Complaint is disposed of accordingly.

    Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िसहा )

    Information Commissioner ( सचू ना आयु )

    Authenticated true copy

    (अभमाणत सयापत त)

    Haro Prasad Sen

    Dy. Registrar

    011-26106140 / haro.sen@nic.in

    हरो साद सने , उप-पंजीयक

    दनाकं / Date

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    AJAY KUMAR CHAKRESH v. Air India
    (May 7, 2019)