Loading..
Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Consumer Protection Act. 1986 Sections 2(1g). 14(1(d). 21(b)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Acts
  • Consumer Protection Act. 1986 Sections 2(1g). 14(1(d). 21(b)

    JATINDAR KAUR v. LIC

    TnUT 5.560/ 19 HFTy

    f.04.09.19 3T-53 as,-zri g T, AaT 62, uri Í, -yfaret

    1

    ETRT afRE

    HUST aer, 19, Hu.rE,

    FAtR HJ.452001

    2

    19 ,

    yHil.RIE. SER

    HI.452001 3 qt.f.28, 60-1, BTTATE

    RS H4T

    462011 eTHTTRAT Yaers ITCT

    .201, -fqueîzruy

    2

    .3.560/19

    ..:

    TONI HTN

    UTGET

    37E278T

    TfHT09.01.2023yfka fTAT)

    37E

    ETHIR

    ()

    (2)

    T e (a) aTHTe 01 347279175 165-25-25 5.1,00,000/-

    02 347279176

    165-25-25 5.1,00,000/- 5.2,00,000/-

    a)

    3t f.18.04.2017 T7 Z

    3TT T GT uRaifeqr

    a feetyuerT gnI TT T TRU gfH

    eTT TE Tci,zaNjeRT304, 308, 427 41.zi. TeT eTRT 9

    ()

    3

    .3.560/ 19

    GHET TMY H[]

    3it

    .23.07.2018 h

    aHT

    3T

    ooReT

    fqTfifr cd i.10 (2)(R) a 4

    3)

    ITET fAuef4TT T et

    ufkarei 2 a zatElRTE d4u7 ENTforril 2,00,000/-7. 77

    a eîtaE qifrrt .18.04.2017 75 HTARTT e3itR t

    aTHTYTRl

    uia-ETI TohfAFI 3TqTeTetife.18.04.2017

    ecttu ueTAI

    GM

    q7 IT TT T

    4

    .56019

    5 Yat37

    3HTY5 4TeY4

    f.10.06.2019ETRT JY fGo

    1,50,000-5, TTTA ay

    3it

    3

    TAT1,500/-T.

    (4)

    Rute

    f.18.04.2017 ÀFTE 8AT

    ufRaifeuT uf FaTR I7TTeT

    qtciH GTT

    eITRT304,427,308HTI.GH.

    TT TRT 9

    .10 4gHTR JoTE Ei

    AHTETRET5(2)() T GtET TGTUTaTNE INT

    (5)

    5

    M35.560/19

    (6)

    (7)

    2.

    H8TT Ya aq ?

    TET

    fRUgR 1

    (8)

    (

    .10

    STEITR 3vetet

    faT8,

    aHT ciferei a (2)a)4

    (10)

    6

    M.3.560/19 fAT TT f

    T

    (11)

    atI

    g UT

    H

    YTHA aATEITY5 aE 9TRT

    304, 308, 427 HTG.

    TeT eTRT9(T) fàle7

    37feftun

    siTta 3uvTEyoaa fabT

    2000 Crl.LJ.2002 (DELHI HIGH

    COURT) Rajiv Gandhi Ekta Samiti, Petitioner, v. Union of India and anotherRespondents Cri.

    M.(M)No.3420 of 1999.D/-23-12-1999

    (A)

    Criminal0.C.(2og 1974).S.482 -

    Invoking

    inherent

    power-Locus standi Petition under S. 482 forquashing/ deleting name of dead person, Late

    Prime Minister in this case

    from charge- sheet filed CBI -by

    filed

    by petitioner. a voluntary organisation named after late

    Prime Minister and founded in his

    memory Is maintainable.

    (B)

    CriminalP.C.

    (2

    of 1974). Ss.173.

    482 - Quashing/deleting of name of dead person from charge-sheet

    Bofors case -Charge- sheet filed

    by CBI in

    form -preseribed under S.173 Name of accused person who is not sent

    up

    for trial due to his death can also be included in

    column 2 of charge-sheet -

    Alleged

    in volvements of Late

    Prime Minister in commission ofoffences of conspiracy and corruption Inclusion of his name in colunin 2 of charge

    sheet meantforaccused personsnotsent

    up

    for irial cannot be deleted

    However. Late Prime Minister is

    entitled to enefit of legal

    presumption that he is innocent and not guilty.

    (12)

    11I

    (2016)CPJ 574

    (NC)

    S.B.1. Life Insurance

    Co.Lid. v.

    Sudesj Khanduja Consumer

    Protection

    Act. 1986

    Sections 2(1g). 14(1(d). 21(b)

    Insurance

    (Life)_

    Suicide Death claim alleged Claim repudiated- - Alleged deficiency in

    service

    Distriet Forum dismissed complaint State Commission -allowed appeal Henceltisrevision not clear from Doctor's whether deceasedtookpoisonornot-report When Insurance

    Company alleging thatthisisa case of suicide. they should have been vigilant and should have produced

    solid and unflappable

    evidence

    Contradictions about heart

    attack made by complainants may

    not be the contradictions It is the generalised term Police report cannot be made basis for repudiation

    of claim Repudiation not justified.

    (13)

    8

    ..560/19

    (11)

    f-

    1. fauett aHTe 2,00,000/-5. (T TG

    5HT

    2.

    H1R5 TT

    ITÝIR5 ATH fr faueft, ufRarci 50,000/-5

    (yUTHEUTR.HTA)JGTTT

    H

    ufaT

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    JATINDAR KAUR v. LIC
    (Jan 9, 2023)