Loading..
Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)

    Ram Prasad Pal v. Indian Army

    क य सचु ना आयोग

    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

    बाबा गंगनाथ माग

    Baba Gangnath Marg

    मिु नरका, नई दली- 110067 Munirka, New Delhi-110067 File no.: CIC/IARMY/A/2019/148483 In the matter of:

    Ram Prasad Pal

    ... Appellant

    VS

    Central Public Information Officer Sena Chikitsa Corps Abhilekh Karyalaya, Army Medical Corps Record Office, Pin 900450, C/O 56 APO

    ...Respondent

    RTI application filed on : 11/01/2019
    CPIO replied on : 22/01/2019
    First appeal filed on : 11/03/2019
    First Appellate Authority order : 30/04/2019
    Second Appeal dated : 03/10/2019
    Date of Hearing : 24/06/2021
    Date of Decision : 24/06/2021

    The following were present:

    Appellant: Heard over phone

    Respondent: Lt. Col P Ashok, PIO, heard over phone

    Information Sought:

    The appellant has not sought any specific information, but has made a request

    for redressal of his grievance with regard to timely promotion to the post Naib

    Subedar.

    Grounds for Second Appeal

    The CPIO has stated that redressal of grievances is out of the purview of RTI

    Act.

    1

    Submissions made by Appellant and Respondent during Hearing:

    The appellant submitted that he is not satisfied with the reply of the CPIO as the desired information was not provided to him.

    The CPIO submitted that an appropriate reply was given to the appellant on

    22.01.2019.

    Observations:

    From a perusal of the relevant case records, it is noted that the appellant through his RTI application did not seek any information but has rather raised a grievance regarding his timely promotion to the post of Naib Subedar. The CPIO in his reply had rightly replied that redressal of grievances is out of the purview of the RTI Act. The appellant should note that any such issue should be raised separately in an administrative manner with the concerned organisation and not through the RTI Act, unless it is in the form of seeking information as the core work of the Commission is to ensure dissemination of available information.

    Decision:

    In view of the above, the Commission does not find any infirmity in the reply of the CPIO and hence there is no scope of any intervention in the matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

    Vanaja N. Sarna (वनजा एन. सरना)

    Information Commissioner (सूचनाआयु)

    Authenticated true copy

    (अिभमाणत सयापतित)

    A.K. Assija (ऐ.के. असीजा)

    Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक)

    011-26182594 /

    दनांक/ Date

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ram Prasad Pal v. Indian Army
    (Jun 24, 2021)