Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    TALUK AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

    - 1 -

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    ON THE 17THDAY OF AUGUST, 2015

    BEFORE

    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH W.P. NO. 13325 OF 2015 (CS - ELE)

    BETWEEN:

    1. Taluk Agricultural Produce Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., Sringeri-577139

    Chickmagalur District

    Represented by its President H.K.Naveen, S/o H.M.Krishnappa Age: 46 years

    2. Halappa Gowda S/o Bellanna Gowda Age: 63 years

    3. C.Pradeep S/o Chinnappa Gowda Age: 50 years

    4. A.Ramakrishna Rao S/o Shankar Rao, Age: 47 years

    5. K.Devendra S/o Kamana Gowda Age: 48 years Petitioners 2 to 5 are the Directors of the Taluk Agricultural Produce Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd.,

    1

    Sringeri-577139 Chickmagalur District. …Petitioners

    (By.Sri. Mahesh.R.Uppin, Advocate)

    AND:

    1. State of Karnataka By its Chief Secretary Vidhana Soudha

    Bangalore-560 001.

    2. The Principal Secretary State of Karnataka Department of Co-operation M.S.Building, Bangalore-560 001.

    3. The Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Ali Asker Road, Bangalore-560 052.

    4. The State Co-operative Election Authority 3rdFloor, Shanthi Nagar

    T.T.M.C. 'A' Block

    Shanthi Nagar, Bangalore-560 027 Represented by its Secretary

    5. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Society / District Election Officer Chickmagalur District, Chickmagalur-577 101 …Respondents

    (By.Sri.R.B.Sathyanarayana Singh, AGA, for R1-3 & R5) Sri.M.Keshava Reddy, Advocate, for R4)

    2

    This WP is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to Strike down provisions of Section 39A(2) and Section 28A (5) as being unconstitutional and unworkable and Direct the Election authority R-3 & 4 to hold Election to the Board of the Director of the Petitioner No.1 Society forthwith. This WP coming on for Further Orders this day, the Court made the following:-

    ORDER

    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. His submission is noted.

    The writ petition is dismissed as such. SD/-

    JUDGE

    Bsv

    3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    TALUK AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
    (Aug 17, 2015)