Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Narayan Dutt Gupta v. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, New India Assurance Company Limited And Others

    Rajesh Shankar, J.:— The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter dated 8 November, 2018 (Anneure-5 to the writ petition) issued by the Branch Manager of the respondent no. 2, whereby the petitioner has been informed that his claim under the medical insurance policy has been closed and the same has accordingly been repudiated. Further prayer has been made for quashing the award dated 26 July, 2019 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) passed by the Insurance Ombudsman for Bihar and Jharkhand, whereby the complaint lodged by the petitioner against repudiation of his medical insurance claim by the respondent-New India Assurance Company Limited, Dhanbad Branch Office, Dhanbad has been dismissed.

    2. Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents-New India Assurance Company Limited raises preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the present writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has efficacious remedy against the impugned letter dated 8 November, 2018 issued by the Branch Manager of the respondent no. 2 and the award dated 26 July, 2019 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman.

    3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view that the petitioner has efficacious/alternative remedy against the impugned letter dated 8 November, 2018 issued by the Branch Manager of the respondent no. 2 and the award dated 26 July, 2019 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman, I am not inclined to entertain the present writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable.

    4. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take recourse of alternative remedy available to him under law.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Narayan Dutt Gupta v. Chairman-Cum-Managin...
    (Jan 3, 2022)