AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    SAF MAZDOOR UNION KANPUR REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER NAMELY KAMAL NAYAN SINGH v. ORDNANCE FACTORY

    Open Court Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad This the 24 th day of September, 2021. Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A) Original Application No. 330/00754/2021

    1. S.A.F Mazdoor Union Kanpur, affiliated to Bhartiya Pratiraksha

    Mazdoor Sangh Reg No. S.A.F 126/1981 and represented by its General Secretary namely Kamal Nayan Singh S/o Shri S.N Singh R/O GIT-130, Armapur Estate, Kanpur. 2. Ordinance Factory Employees Union, Kanpur, a registered Union having Registration No.ma.Kha. 37/2021 affiliated to Bhartiya

    Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh and represented by its General

    Secretary namely Ved Vyash Mani Tripathi S/o Bhubneshwer

    Mani Tripathi R/O 61-177 Armapur eastate Kanpur. 3. Q.A Sramiksangh a registered Union having Registration No.Ma. Kha. 37/2021 affiliated to Bhartiya Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh

    and represented by its General Secretary namely Ghanshyam

    Prasad S/o Late Jairam Prasad R/O 328 Barra-8 Kanpur. ……….. APPLICANTS

    By Advocate: Shri L.M. Singh and Shri Manish Kumar Yadav.

    Versus

    1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence,

    (Defence Production), Government of India, South Block, New Delhi - 110001. 2. The Controller General of Defence Accounts, Ministry of Defence, having office at Ulan Bazar Road, Palam Colony, Delhi

    Cantonment, Delhi - 110010. 3. General Manager, Small Arms Factory Kanpur, Kalpi Road, Kanpur.

    1

    2 4. General Manager, Ordinance Factory Kanpur, Kalpi Road, Kanpur. 208009. 5. The Director General of Quality/Senior Officer Assurance, S.A.F Kanpur, S.Q.A.E. (S.A) Kanpur.

    .………RESPONDENTS.

    By Advocate: Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan.

    ORDER

    Shri L.M. Singh and Shri Manish Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents, are present. 2. By virtue of this O.A., the applicants seek the following relief: i. To direct the respondents to include the HRA, TA and SFA for purpose of calculation of overtime allowance in terms of order dated

    01.02.2021 in O.A. 139/2021 passed by the Hon'ble CAT, Kolkata

    Bench, order dated 25.04.2018 in O.A. 605/2016 passed by the

    Hon'ble CAT Principal Bench and order dated 04.04.2014 in O.A.

    1372/2012 passed by Hon'ble CAT, Hyderabad Bench respectively

    with all consequential benefits and relies the arrears in favor of the

    respective Applicants/members of the applicant Union with 18%

    interest.

    ii. Issue any other and further writ, orders or directions, which

    this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

    iii. Award cost of the Original Application to the Applicant.

    3. Shri L.M Singh, learned counsel for the applicants points out that there are various pronouncements including the order of the Principal Bench of CAT and Kolkata Bench of CAT wherein the relief sought in this O.A. has been extended to similarly placed employees of the department. He seeks a direction for disposal of this

    2

    3 O.A. at admission stage by extending similar relief to the present applicants on the ground that they are also similarly placed and the facts and circumstances are identical without even a minor deviation. 4. Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file reply and also requests that it needs to be ascertained

    as to whether they have made a comprehensive representation in this

    regard and exhausted the administrative remedy available to them. 5. In the light of the fact that this matter has also been decided by the Principal Bench of CAT and also by the Kolkata bench, it

    would be fair at this stage to give a direction to the respondents to

    examine the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgements

    already rendered by the aforesaid Benches of this Tribunal and take a

    decision on the claim accordingly. 6. The applicants are directed to make a fresh comprehensive representation within a period of four weeks from the date of this

    order along with all the necessary supporting documents and the

    judgements they are relying upon. 7. The respondents, on receipt of such a representation,

    should take a decision on this within eight weeks strictly in

    accordance with the law and the rules governing the subject and the

    pronouncements made by the aforesaid Benches. 8. With these directions, the O.A. stands disposed off.

    (Tarun Shridhar)

    Member (A)

    (Ritu Raj)

    3

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    SAF MAZDOOR UNION KA... v. ORDNANCE FACTORY
    (Sep 24, 2021)