Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 323, 328, 376 and 506 IPC.
  • Section 482 Cr. P.C.,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 323, 328, 376 and 506 IPC.
  • Section 482 Cr. P.C.,
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    ATUL SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

    105

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

    AT CHANDIGARH

    CRM-M-26321-2020 Date of decision: 07.09.2020

    Atul Sharma ......Petitioner. vs.

    State of Haryana and another ......Respondents.

    CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

    Present: - Mr. Venu Gopal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Mahima Yashpal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Manju, PS Gurgaon Sadar.

    ......

    Sanjay Kumar, J. (ORAL)

    The petitioner is the sole accused in FIR No. 407 dated 20.7.2020 on the file of Police Station Gurgaon Sadar, District Gurugram, Haryana, registered under Sections 323, 328, 376 and 506 IPC. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C., he seeks quashing of the said FIR.

    The petitioner claims that he compromised the matter with the complainant, the second respondent herein, by way of compromise deed dated 5.8.2020 and pursuant thereto, they also got married. Mr. Sahil Mangla, learned counsel, entered appearance for the second respondent and filed his vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. He states, on instructions, that the second respondent has no dispute with the petitioner presently and that they are leading a happy married life. The affidavit dated 5.9.2020 of the second respondent also states to this effect.

    For Subsequent orders see CRM-9726-2021 Decided by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH

    1 of 2

    CRM-M-26321-2020 -2- Ms. Mahima Yashpal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, would also submit that that there are no grounds to continue with the prosecution of the subject case.

    In that view of the matter, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 407 dated 20.7.2020 on the file of Police Station Gurgaon Sadar, District Gurugram, Haryana, and all proceedings pertaining thereto are hereby quashed.

    (SANJAY KUMAR)

    JUDGE

    07.09.2020

    preeti

    whether speaking/non speaking yes/no whether reportable/non reportable yes/no

    Neutral Citation No:=2020:PHHC:059622 For Subsequent orders see CRM-9726-2021 Decided by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH

    2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    ATUL SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
    (Sep 7, 2020)