Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2020 DHC 2188
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 14 of the Family Courts Act
  • section 65-B of the Evidence Act
  • section 14 of the Family Court of Act
  • section 81 of the Information Technology Act 2000
  • the Criminal Procedure Code
  • Articles 20(3) and 14 of the Constitution
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872)
  • Articles 14 and 21
  • Section 79 of the IT Act
  • section 50 of the NDPS Act
  • Rule 112-A of Income Tax Rules
  • Section 7 of the Evidence Act
  • section 20 of the Act
  • Sec.-14 of The Family Courts Act
  • Articles 14, 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31 of the Constitution
  • section 20 of the Family Courts Act
  • Section 292 IPC
  • section 292 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
  • Article 21 of the Constitution of India
  • Section 81 of the IT Act
  • Fourth Amendment of the American Constitution
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872
  • Article 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India
  • section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • section 3 of the Evidence Act
  • Section 25 of the Telegraph Act, 1885
  • Fifth Amendment of the American Constitution
  • section 14 of the Family Courts Act 1984
  • Article 20(3)
  • sec.-14 of the Family Court Act
  • Article 227 of the Constitution of India
  • section 50 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ('NDPS Act', for short)
  • section 122 of the Evidence Act
  • sections 5, 7 and 8 of the Evidence Act
  • Section 13 of the Act
  • The Family Courts Act 1984
  • section 132 of the Income Tax Act 1961
  • Section 65B
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2020 DHC 2188
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Section 14 of the Family Courts Act
  • section 65-B of the Evidence Act
  • section 14 of the Family Court of Act
  • section 81 of the Information Technology Act 2000
  • the Criminal Procedure Code
  • Articles 20(3) and 14 of the Constitution
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872)
  • Articles 14 and 21
  • Section 79 of the IT Act
  • section 50 of the NDPS Act
  • Rule 112-A of Income Tax Rules
  • Section 7 of the Evidence Act
  • section 20 of the Act
  • Sec.-14 of The Family Courts Act
  • Articles 14, 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31 of the Constitution
  • section 20 of the Family Courts Act
  • Section 292 IPC
  • section 292 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
  • Article 21 of the Constitution of India
  • Section 81 of the IT Act
  • Fourth Amendment of the American Constitution
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872
  • Article 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India
  • section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • section 3 of the Evidence Act
  • Section 25 of the Telegraph Act, 1885
  • Fifth Amendment of the American Constitution
  • section 14 of the Family Courts Act 1984
  • Article 20(3)
  • sec.-14 of the Family Court Act
  • Article 227 of the Constitution of India
  • section 50 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ('NDPS Act', for short)
  • section 122 of the Evidence Act
  • sections 5, 7 and 8 of the Evidence Act
  • Section 13 of the Act
  • The Family Courts Act 1984
  • section 132 of the Income Tax Act 1961
  • Section 65B
This judgment contains sensitive subject matter and is not displayed to guest users. Please sign into access the full judgment, citations, and related authorities.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Deepti Kapur v. Kunal Julka .
(Jun 30, 2020)