Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
  • Ms. Nelly Mehta i/by M/s. N. Vaishnawa and Co., for Plaintiffs in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. Sharan Jagtiani with Mr. B. Palav i/by M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Defendant Nos. 15 in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. S. Pathak, for Defendant Nos. 6 and 12 in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. P.M. Havnur with Ms. Radhika Samant, K. Pradish Suvarna, for Defendant No. 8 in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. D.D. Madon, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Alluwaria M/s. Khaitan and Khaitan, for Plaintiffs in COMS (L) No. 29 of 2017.
  • M/s. S. Pathak and co., for Plaintiff in Suit No. 60 of 2017.
  • Mr. Chetan Kapadia i/by M/s. S. Pathak and Co., for Plaintiffs.
  • Mr. H. Toor i/by Mr. Susmit Phatale, for Defendant No. 1 in Suit No. 60 of 2017 and COMS (L) No. 29 of 2017.
  • Mr. Sharan Jagtiani with Mr. B. Palav i/by M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Defendant No. 2.
Judges
  • S.J. Kathawalla, J.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
  • Ms. Nelly Mehta i/by M/s. N. Vaishnawa and Co., for Plaintiffs in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. Sharan Jagtiani with Mr. B. Palav i/by M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Defendant Nos. 15 in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. S. Pathak, for Defendant Nos. 6 and 12 in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. P.M. Havnur with Ms. Radhika Samant, K. Pradish Suvarna, for Defendant No. 8 in Suit No. 8 of 2017.
  • Mr. D.D. Madon, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Alluwaria M/s. Khaitan and Khaitan, for Plaintiffs in COMS (L) No. 29 of 2017.
  • M/s. S. Pathak and co., for Plaintiff in Suit No. 60 of 2017.
  • Mr. Chetan Kapadia i/by M/s. S. Pathak and Co., for Plaintiffs.
  • Mr. H. Toor i/by Mr. Susmit Phatale, for Defendant No. 1 in Suit No. 60 of 2017 and COMS (L) No. 29 of 2017.
  • Mr. Sharan Jagtiani with Mr. B. Palav i/by M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Defendant No. 2.
Judges
  • S.J. Kathawalla, J.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

    Manisha Saraf v. Orbit Corporation

    S.J. Kathawalla, J.:— The learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs tenders draft amendment in Suit No. 62 of 2017 and seeks to amend the Plaint in terms of the draft amendment. Draft amendment is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Advocate for the Plaintiffs are allowed to amend the Plaint in terms of the draft amendment, marked ‘X’. Amendment to be carried out on or before 4 March, 2017. Re-verification is dispensed with.

    2. Stand over to 20-03-2017 to decide the issue of jurisdiction.

    3. In the meantime, the parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the suit properties as of today. It is clarified that if any order is passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai, on 08-03-2017 or on any other day, no further steps shall be taken by the Bank to implement the said order.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.
    Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

    Comments

    Manisha Saraf v. Orbit Corporation
    (Mar 3, 2017)