AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The Supreme Court of India heard the matter involving the Union of India (represented by the learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr. Tushar Mehta) and the respondent (represented by senior advocates Mr. Kapil Sibal and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi) in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 9360/2018. The case concerned two criminal writ petitions—W.P.(Crl.) No. 363 of 2018 and W.P.(Crl.) No. 739 of 2018—both pending before the High Court of Delhi. In light of “conflicting views of various High Courts,” the Supreme Court decided, sua sponte, to transfer these writ petitions (and their connected criminal miscellaneous applications) to itself for consolidated consideration. The Court also preserved the interim relief earlier granted by the High Court in W.P.(Crl.) No. 739 of 2018 and fixed 26 March 2018 at 2:00 p.m. for the next hearing.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the pendency of conflicting High Court views warranted transfer of W.P.(Crl.) No. 363 of 2018 and W.P.(Crl.) No. 739 of 2018 (with their connected applications) from the High Court of Delhi to the Supreme Court for adjudication.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court, after hearing brief submissions from counsel on both sides, noted that multiple High Courts had issued divergent rulings on the legal questions raised in the pending writ petitions. To avoid inconsistency and ensure authoritative resolution, the bench held that consolidating the cases before the Supreme Court was appropriate. The Court therefore exercised its power to transfer the matters, directed the Delhi High Court Registry to transmit the records, and scheduled a joint hearing. Recognizing the need to maintain the status quo, it continued the interim relief earlier granted by the High Court until the next date of hearing. Finally, the bench acknowledged counsels’ assurances that oral arguments would be concise, thereby facilitating an expedited determination.

Holding and Implications

Holding: The Supreme Court ordered the transfer of W.P.(Crl.) No. 363 of 2018 with Crl.M.A. No. 2151/2018, and W.P.(Crl.) No. 739 of 2018 with Crl.M.A. No. 4539/2018, from the High Court of Delhi to the Supreme Court. The interim relief granted in W.P.(Crl.) No. 739 of 2018 will remain operative until at least 26 March 2018, when the matters will be listed for hearing.

Implications: The immediate effect is procedural consolidation of related writ petitions before the apex court, ensuring a uniform resolution of issues on which High Courts have differed. The order preserves existing interim relief for the respondent but sets no new substantive precedent beyond the transfer itself.

    Directorate Of Enforcement Petitioner(S) v. Karti P. Chidambaram (S).

    1. Heard Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Solicitor General for Union of India and Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel for the respondent in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. (Diary No. 9360/18).

    2. Having heard learned counsel for the appearing parties, we think it appropriate to transfer W.P.(Crl.) No. 363 of 2018 along with Crl.M.A. No. 2151 of 2018 filed in the said writ petition and pending before the High Court of Delhi, to this Court. We are directing so, as there are conflicting views of various High Courts.

    3. Registry is directed to intimate the Registry of the High Court of Delhi to call for the papers of the abovementioned case(s) and list the same at 2:00 p.m. on 26.03.2018 along with the present matters.

    4. That apart, W.P.(Crl.) No. 739 of 2018 along with Crl.M.A. No. 4539 of 2018 shall also stand transferred to this Court and papers be called for and the writ petition be listed on the abovementioned date.

    5. The interim relief granted by the High Court in W.P. (Crl.) No. 739 of 2018 shall remain in force till the next date of hearing, i.e., 26.03.2018.

    6. Mr. Mehta, very fairly submitted that he will not argue the matter for more than an hour. Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel and Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent have also stated that both of them may not take more than an hour and fifteen minutes.

    7. We appreciate the said submission at the Bar.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Directorate Of Enforcement Petitioner(S) v. Karti P. Chidambaram (S).
    (Mar 15, 2018)