Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Hav/Na Babu Manoli v. Union Of India

    Ved Prakash Vaish, J.:— The petitioners have filed the present writ petition claiming that the petitioners are entitled to nursing allowance and arrears. The petitioners are also seeking directions thereby directing the respondents to grant the benefit of nursing allowance and arrears to the petitioners.

    2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are serving as Nursing Assistants in the Assam Rifles and are not receiving nursing allowance as per entitlement. The petitioners are entitled to receive nursing allowance in terms of letter No. A/Pers/Nursing Allce/2012/1298 dated 04.01.2013 issued by Colonel (A) for Directorate General (DG) Assam Rifles, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India whereby it was intimated that the Ministry of Home Affairs vide order U.O No. 27013/7/2012. PF.IV dated 17.12.2012 had conveyed the decision to extend the benefit of nursing allowance to Nursing Personnel of Assam Rifles.

    3. It is also stated that the case of the petitioners is covered by the Judgment and Order dated 04.11.2010 passed by Shillong Bench, Gauhati High Court in WP(C) No. 279 (SH) of 2009. The respondents challenged the said order by filing writ appeal No. 1 (SH) of 2011 which was dismissed by Hon'ble Division Bench, Gauhati High Court.

    4. It is also stated by the petitioners that a similar petition bearing WP(C) (SH) No. 256 of 2013 titled as Ex-HAV/NA.M/370622X v. The Union of India was filed and the same was allowed by this Court vide Judgment and Order dated 19.09.2013 The appeal against the said order bearing Writ Appeal No. 31 of 2014 was also dismissed on 11th July, 2014.

    5. The respondents have filed an affidavit of Lt. Col. Saurabh Charan SO-1 (A) along with order dated 17.01.2017 Copy of the affidavit has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners.

    6. Mr. K. Paul, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has submitted that the respondents have sanctioned the nursing allowance and arrears to the Nursing Assistants working in Assam Rifles vide order dated 17.01.2017 He further submits that nursing allowance and arrears have been sanctioned to the petitioners vide order dated 17.01.2017

    7. Mr. D. Thabah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that he has received copy of the affidavit and order dated 17.01.2017 He also submits that in view of the fact that nursing allowance and arrears have been sanctioned to the petitioners, the petitioners do not want to pursue with the present petition.

    8. The counsel for petitioners has moved an application for withdrawal of the present petition. The counsel for respondents has no objection to the same.

    9. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well the application filed on behalf of the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Hav/Na Babu Manoli v. Union Of India
    (Jan 31, 2017)