Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Sachin Nandal Petitioner v. Union Of India & Anr. S

    * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

    Date of Order: April 09, 2018

    + W.P.(C) 3442/2018 SACHIN NANDAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate Versus

    UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents

    Through: Mr. Vikas Mehta & Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Advocates

    CORAM:

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

    ORDER

    (ORAL)

    1. Petitioner claims to have applied for the post of Marketing Assistant in pursuance to Advertisement No. GAIL/OPEN/MISC/1/2017 issued by second respondent and is said to have participated in the written examination. According to petitioner, an e-mail was received from 2nd respondent on 18thJanuary, 2018 asking petitioner to come for verification of original certificates and for pre-employment medical examination scheduled on 10th/ 11thFebruary, 2018.

    2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had produced his original certificates for verification and had undergone the medical examination but thereafter, petitioner was orally told that his case has been put on hold. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no

    1

    response to Legal Notice of 19thFebruary, 2018 (Annexure P-6) sent on behalf of petitioner to second respondent.

    3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to second respondent to consider Legal Notice of 19thFebruary, 2018 (Annexure P-6) as a Representation and to pass a speaking order thereon, within a period of four weeks. The fate of Legal Notice of 19thFebruary, 2018 (Annexure P-6) be conveyed to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be.

    4. With aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel representing both the sides.

    (SUNIL GAUR)

    JUDGE

    APRIL 09, 2018

    r

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Sachin Nandal Petitioner v. Union Of India & Anr. S
    (Apr 9, 2018)