AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Mithulal Pandey Petitioner v. The State Of M.P And Ors. S

    I.A No. 15478/2014 is made seeking amendment in the return to correct the typographical error.

    On due consideration, I.A aforesaid stands allowed.

    Let the amendment be incorporated in the return within two working days.

    Though virtually the entire claim of the petitioner is admitted, but only this much is said that the Departmental Promotion Commitee has not found the petitioner eligible to be promoted on the next post, therefore, his claim was not considered for such promotion. Such a stand of the respondents is not proper to adjudicate the claim made by the petitioner. Respondents to look into this and to file a categorical statement on affidavit what were the reasons of not finding the petitioner eligible for such promotion within two weeks, failing which the writ petition would be heard without such additional affidavit of the respondents.

    Be listed in the week commencing 12.1.2015 for the said purposes.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Mithulal Pandey Petitioner v. The State Of M.P And Ors. S
    (Dec 16, 2014)