AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2017 INSC 703
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2017 INSC 703
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited v. State Of Haryana And Others

    Kurian Joseph, J.— Leave granted. The issue pertains to the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondent State. During the pendency of the proceedings before this Court, in view of the introduction of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short “the 2013 Act”), the question arose as to whether the acquisition proceedings have lapsed or not.

    2. On the admitted position that the compensation has not been paid to the owners, in view of the settled position, this Court has to give a declaration that the proceedings have lapsed. Ordered accordingly.

    3. Now that the entire acquired land has been used by the State, the only option available to them is to initiate fresh proceedings under the 2013 Act within six months from today.

    4. We make it clear that in case no steps are taken for acquisition under the 2013 Act, the respondent State shall not lay any claim in respect of the land in dispute.

    5. With the above observations and directions, this appeal is disposed of. No costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited v. State Of Haryana And Others
    (Aug 3, 2017)